@William Dinan here you go: okay caveat this with not a lawyer but here's the text of the SCOTUS order: "The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of
complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of
the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially
cognizable interest in the manner in which another State
conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed
as moot." and here's a link discussing standing under section 2 article III of the US Constitution where you find this: "Although the Court has been inconsistent, it has now settled upon the rule that, “at an irreducible minimum,” the constitutional requisites under Article III for the existence of standing are that the plaintiff must personally have: 1) suffered some actual or threatened injury; 2) that injury can fairly be traced to the challenged action of the defendant; and 3) that the injury is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision" my uneducated guess is that one or more of those three don't apply https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/20-substantial-interest-standing.html
