I believe he is talking about Injunctive Relief.

They may want to change a law outside a special session but that doesnt mean they can ignore the rules

Orange is beautiful.

> Did I forget to mention how appealing your orange skin tone is to me for some reason I'm not able to articulate.
@busillis Perhaps. But I can drink in that flattery as often as you serve it.

I listening to @Uncivil Law very carefully

Good policy. He's good.

I might also like to add at least someone has a plan.

yeah but injunctive relief is the whole thing here ... SCOTUS doesn't stop these states from sending electors to vote today then it's done

@meglide ...albeit a heretic and CCP Soros shill

They went to a judge and said I dont like the law we passed to choose an elector. I'd prefer if the popular vote didnt matter and we have the right to pass a law that picks the electors. They are just like sorry what? You want us to let you break your own law? That's not how this works 😂

They could have even thrown out the votes somehow and states are still arbiters of the will of their people.

Fail

Not really. The President Elect is not established until Congress Accepted the Electoral College Votes next Month.

MCGA... In all of its iterations and permutations.

Hey, I found a link to the full report.

https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/12/antrim-county-computer-forensic-report/

Seems legit.

MCGA!

correct but SCOTUS is out of it at that point, then it's up to Congress to accept or reject

Make C&C&C&C&C Great Again

@Zuluzeit thank you Chairman Dear Leader, for all that you do.

We all do our part.

I prefer to do my part behind the lines and underneath the roles.

It’s kinda of odd that the creators of the first Great Wall aren’t fans on the guy building the second Great Wall.

Never thought about that before. Huh.

It makes perfect sense party members want to enjoy The prestige of having the greatest wall ever built, for all time and ever and ever.

Hipsters.

This has only be argued twice in our History. There is not much Case Law on this Issue. There is a Nuance to Constitution Law on this Issue. One of the major reasons I believe Standing was a Bad way to Address this Issue. IMO

Standing is not some exotic thing

@james j, you just advanced to level 34!

Either you are injured or you aren’t

In this case you aren’t

You can’t tell other states what their laws are

With that I need to find a luckin coffee mission, I mean house , so I can continue my recruitment efforts under the thousand talents plan.

with the exception of the elector's clause

We did not have such a thing for At least for the First 100 Years.

Right @meglide

The idea of Standing has existed throughout our history

@Zuluzeit Chairman, I know from your past work you've dealt with 65 million when will you deal with the current 65 million?

It’s a good law. I can’t sue you for doing something that I have no say in

Or show injury

@William Dinan good discussion ... won't argue that manner in which SCOTUS denied the relief was the best, just that makes sense given the circumstances

> @Zuluzeit Chairman, I know from your past work you've dealt with 65 million when will you deal with the current 65 million?
@busillis They will be cared for like everyone else. Eventually they will see it's not so bad.