Message from @AOH_Assassin
Discord ID: 789307068245999626
It certainly feels like the SC hasn't defended the constitution. Whether that event happened or not.
pray for the best but have to prepare for the worst
@Dreadnaught yep
Yea, I don't see how so many judges can throw these cases out over and over because of minor procedural issues.... it seems like the actual issues are much more important that that.
I am uncivil law
I make videos 🙂
I think they are both informative and fun 🙂
we have uncivil and uncommon laws sadly lol
Not bad. Have to say though, whether the event you start off talking about happened or not, the sentiment of the 'Leak' is in line with some truth. Now calling for their blood is a little rough.
the sentiment? What are you talking about?
But when cases keep getting kicked out of court before the election because the election hasn't happened yet. Then after the election they get thrown out because they waited too long.
Is this some AOC-like thing. "I think that there’s a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right."
Take the PA case, the lower court ruled in favor and the state SC took it up without an appeal and threw it out on laches.
yeah the supreme court of PA can do that in their system
If no one hears these cases on the merits
There is going to be some pretty jacked people for justifiable reasons.
At least it might not be the end of the world....
well, less so from my perspective, but I maintain a separation between law and politics in my own mind,
The decisions from the courts I have seen have all looked pretty reasonable to me
I'm just listening to the middle of your video... umm what?!? holy. Who was saying what? I"m going to have to pay closer attention.
@AOH_Assassin that is the exact same source I already saw
It is not reliable
Like a voice recording?
Yeah
We don’t truly know either way.
Premature to say one way or the other
Just wanted to share
It is from a source that is a total crockpot and it smells wrong. Short of proving a negative, I am pretty sure
Libs always attack the messenger when the message doesn’t conform with their beliefs sigh...
Just because it smells wrong , doesn’t mean it’s not true
@AOH_Assassin, you just advanced to level 10!
I'm not a lib, but Lin Wood is not the light of truth...
I do believe corruption exists at all levels
again, I can't prove a negative
but it looks like a forgery to me
several cases have been heard on the merits ... also understand that many of the dismissals have involved things like asking for remedies that are not proportional to the harm, @RobertGrulerEsq covered much of this early on, lots of times they would present evidence that a small number of ballots might have been compromised or illegitimate and then want a huge swath of ballots thrown out, over and over you heard Robert address this in the shows right after the election ... in all cases there was a complaint filed and a response, then judge may have heard oral arguments (Giuliani himself argued a case in PA) and made a ruling, so to say that no cases have been heard on the merits is just not true
Impossible no corruption.
🤪
improbable, always theoretically possible even if never practically possible
The people that think corruption exists in some places but not others are very naive