<a:FiteMe:670044120483627018>

all good points - the bigger point which has been gleamed over - is that WHY ARE THE DEMS AGAINST THE FORENSIC AUDITS???

Dems are for real audits. Powell is for fake audits.

The dems are for forcing what they believe down your throat. They're terrible authoritarians.

If you want audits to hold up in court you send it to a neutral state certified lab. If you want to be thrown out of court but trick people into a hyperpartisan narrative you dial up Ramsland

And the Republicans are slightly better authoritarians?

There for real audits wherever they think it'll help them.

Republicans are a bunch of shit bags too.

You cant just put the word forensic many dozens of times in a report and pretend that makes it official

Ultra-Forensic

Forensic +

https://www.foxnews.com/us/massachusetts-inmates-get-coronavirus-vaccine

Forensic++

What's your qualifications to test this election equipment did you get the certification training? No I lost an election a few years ago and I think it was rigged.

🚽

Here's the thing - Dominion's system PURPOSELY increased the number of ballots requiring adjudication - all in secret and without observers from both sides of the isle, all behind closed doors - 63% error rate was the official number, forget which state (Michigan or Wisconsin - can't remember which one) - yeah - we're to believe in a Dem Entrenched City with anti-trump people working the polls and counts (literally wearing Biden-Harris gear) - that these people were being honest when there were total shifts in the vote counts - sorry, i'm not that gullible

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWnqSlBSDUA

https://youtu.be/EWGEO4kb-UE

It was one county in Michigan and what happened they changed the ballot and some of the precincts to include a school board election or something like that and then they didn't actually update the tabulating machines correctly. That mistake was caught and fixed. The Michigan State legislature heard from the CEO of Dominion systems. They also did a hand recount of all the ballots in that county and it came out exactly as the machines had tabulated.

Not posting as evidence. Just as an interesting call.

well when the narrative writers tell the american public something was audited - one would think it was actually audited not that people recounted the same fraudulent ballots - so when one says they need to audit the equipment - who the f*ck knows that those liars will tell the public next - so yeah - i use the word forensic as in with a scalpel like a medical professional performs an autopsy looking for evidence of how someone died and is trying to find evidence of who murdered them - not just someone saying "ohh yeah - he's dead - next"

63% error rate is not an official number. That's a Ramsfact. Adjudication is a bipartisan process and it was not done on most ballots.

right - it was done behind closed doors without observers

Sure 😉

as military DBA i can tell you, that whenever you enter to 2 DBAS to together you have whole issues more then just numbers.

@Solsheldon, you just advanced to level 1!

Sometimes people die of heart disease rather than murder. If you do one autopsy and you don't find any bullets do you have to keep looking?

yeah you keep looking how did you find out they died of heart disease

Exactly Ramsland violated those voting machines behind closed doors with admin access without observers. He made up whatever he wanted like 63% error rate and is not certified to test election machines for problems

well today - that's all changed - they just through a Covid-19 sticker on it and call it a day - so then there's that bs

That's what I'm saying they looked at this thing several times. They counted the ballots by hand they've done lots of things they haven't found any evidence of fraud. You're saying just keep looking in that body till you find the bullets is what your theory is.

btw - i was being sarcastic with the thumbs up

what are you talking about? the state give him access with the state supervising it

https://rumble.com/vbzvpp-the-third-video-was-taken-at-a-table-where-the-ballots-from-central-lake-tw.html

Except you know

"this is not an investigation"

That wasnt supervised. They just gave over the machines and Powell fought for no official state scrutiny.

you can google the ballots and print em. bud. not hard

yeah - the lefties are all ignoring that one

i posted the entire video of the woman actually telling them they weren't there to evaluate the legitimacy of the ballots - just to count them

show me where powell won without state supervise.