Message from @Dedkraken

Discord ID: 791536219128725505


2020-12-24 05:13:40 UTC  

the box?

2020-12-24 05:14:31 UTC  

That's what it says right there highlighted

2020-12-24 05:15:44 UTC  

it's the entire thing - the software is was developed to be used on that specific hardware

2020-12-24 05:15:50 UTC  

which is windows based

2020-12-24 05:16:03 UTC  

and running on win7

2020-12-24 05:16:13 UTC  

(some just 2 yrs ago were still running xp)

2020-12-24 05:16:29 UTC  

like that's not a security issue when connected to servers

2020-12-24 05:16:38 UTC  

which has been proven time and time again

2020-12-24 05:17:04 UTC  

Yeah software is made for the specific hardware correct.

2020-12-24 05:17:37 UTC  

@SoonMrWick Thanks for the server boost, Robert probably doesn't really know what that is yet, but I'm sure he appreciates it.

2020-12-24 05:17:53 UTC  

nevermind that this is what the problem democrat run cities called "observing the signature audit" taken by a poll watcher

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/791535095890444318/EpYfS1SXMAU5Ukz.png

2020-12-24 05:18:15 UTC  

I think the biggest issue is that many of the court cases tell the many ways the system *COULD* be exploited. Not necessarily that IT WAS. That's why they are freaking out to seize the system.

There are some indications that it very well could have been but can't prove it without the details directly from a system audit.

And to make it worse, if they updated the software after then that's likely contaminated, but this is out of my rhelm... soooooo

2020-12-24 05:18:52 UTC  

<a:FiteMe:670044120483627018>

2020-12-24 05:19:14 UTC  

all good points - the bigger point which has been gleamed over - is that WHY ARE THE DEMS AGAINST THE FORENSIC AUDITS???

2020-12-24 05:19:38 UTC  

Dems are for real audits. Powell is for fake audits.

2020-12-24 05:20:54 UTC  

The dems are for forcing what they believe down your throat. They're terrible authoritarians.

2020-12-24 05:21:24 UTC  

If you want audits to hold up in court you send it to a neutral state certified lab. If you want to be thrown out of court but trick people into a hyperpartisan narrative you dial up Ramsland

2020-12-24 05:21:41 UTC  

And the Republicans are slightly better authoritarians?

2020-12-24 05:21:46 UTC  

There for real audits wherever they think it'll help them.

2020-12-24 05:22:05 UTC  

Republicans are a bunch of shit bags too.

2020-12-24 05:22:20 UTC  

You cant just put the word forensic many dozens of times in a report and pretend that makes it official

2020-12-24 05:22:46 UTC  

Ultra-Forensic

2020-12-24 05:23:03 UTC  

Forensic +

2020-12-24 05:24:25 UTC  

Forensic++

2020-12-24 05:25:44 UTC  

What's your qualifications to test this election equipment did you get the certification training? No I lost an election a few years ago and I think it was rigged.

2020-12-24 05:26:05 UTC  

🚽

2020-12-24 05:27:14 UTC  

Here's the thing - Dominion's system PURPOSELY increased the number of ballots requiring adjudication - all in secret and without observers from both sides of the isle, all behind closed doors - 63% error rate was the official number, forget which state (Michigan or Wisconsin - can't remember which one) - yeah - we're to believe in a Dem Entrenched City with anti-trump people working the polls and counts (literally wearing Biden-Harris gear) - that these people were being honest when there were total shifts in the vote counts - sorry, i'm not that gullible

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/791537450081321000/WhatsApp_Video_2020-12-24_at_12.18.27_AM.mp4

2020-12-24 05:29:35 UTC  

It was one county in Michigan and what happened they changed the ballot and some of the precincts to include a school board election or something like that and then they didn't actually update the tabulating machines correctly. That mistake was caught and fixed. The Michigan State legislature heard from the CEO of Dominion systems. They also did a hand recount of all the ballots in that county and it came out exactly as the machines had tabulated.

2020-12-24 05:29:38 UTC  

Not posting as evidence. Just as an interesting call.

2020-12-24 05:30:08 UTC  

well when the narrative writers tell the american public something was audited - one would think it was actually audited not that people recounted the same fraudulent ballots - so when one says they need to audit the equipment - who the f*ck knows that those liars will tell the public next - so yeah - i use the word forensic as in with a scalpel like a medical professional performs an autopsy looking for evidence of how someone died and is trying to find evidence of who murdered them - not just someone saying "ohh yeah - he's dead - next"

2020-12-24 05:30:20 UTC  

63% error rate is not an official number. That's a Ramsfact. Adjudication is a bipartisan process and it was not done on most ballots.

2020-12-24 05:31:14 UTC  

right - it was done behind closed doors without observers

2020-12-24 05:31:17 UTC  

Sure 😉

2020-12-24 05:31:34 UTC  

as military DBA i can tell you, that whenever you enter to 2 DBAS to together you have whole issues more then just numbers.

2020-12-24 05:31:34 UTC  

@Solsheldon, you just advanced to level 1!

2020-12-24 05:31:36 UTC  

Sometimes people die of heart disease rather than murder. If you do one autopsy and you don't find any bullets do you have to keep looking?

2020-12-24 05:32:15 UTC  

yeah you keep looking how did you find out they died of heart disease

2020-12-24 05:32:33 UTC  

Exactly Ramsland violated those voting machines behind closed doors with admin access without observers. He made up whatever he wanted like 63% error rate and is not certified to test election machines for problems