Message from @Dedkraken
Discord ID: 791536219128725505
the box?
That's what it says right there highlighted
it's the entire thing - the software is was developed to be used on that specific hardware
which is windows based
and running on win7
(some just 2 yrs ago were still running xp)
like that's not a security issue when connected to servers
which has been proven time and time again
Yeah software is made for the specific hardware correct.
@SoonMrWick Thanks for the server boost, Robert probably doesn't really know what that is yet, but I'm sure he appreciates it.
nevermind that this is what the problem democrat run cities called "observing the signature audit" taken by a poll watcher
I think the biggest issue is that many of the court cases tell the many ways the system *COULD* be exploited. Not necessarily that IT WAS. That's why they are freaking out to seize the system.
There are some indications that it very well could have been but can't prove it without the details directly from a system audit.
And to make it worse, if they updated the software after then that's likely contaminated, but this is out of my rhelm... soooooo
<a:FiteMe:670044120483627018>
all good points - the bigger point which has been gleamed over - is that WHY ARE THE DEMS AGAINST THE FORENSIC AUDITS???
Dems are for real audits. Powell is for fake audits.
The dems are for forcing what they believe down your throat. They're terrible authoritarians.
If you want audits to hold up in court you send it to a neutral state certified lab. If you want to be thrown out of court but trick people into a hyperpartisan narrative you dial up Ramsland
And the Republicans are slightly better authoritarians?
There for real audits wherever they think it'll help them.
Republicans are a bunch of shit bags too.
You cant just put the word forensic many dozens of times in a report and pretend that makes it official
Ultra-Forensic
Forensic +
Forensic++
What's your qualifications to test this election equipment did you get the certification training? No I lost an election a few years ago and I think it was rigged.
🚽
Here's the thing - Dominion's system PURPOSELY increased the number of ballots requiring adjudication - all in secret and without observers from both sides of the isle, all behind closed doors - 63% error rate was the official number, forget which state (Michigan or Wisconsin - can't remember which one) - yeah - we're to believe in a Dem Entrenched City with anti-trump people working the polls and counts (literally wearing Biden-Harris gear) - that these people were being honest when there were total shifts in the vote counts - sorry, i'm not that gullible
It was one county in Michigan and what happened they changed the ballot and some of the precincts to include a school board election or something like that and then they didn't actually update the tabulating machines correctly. That mistake was caught and fixed. The Michigan State legislature heard from the CEO of Dominion systems. They also did a hand recount of all the ballots in that county and it came out exactly as the machines had tabulated.
Not posting as evidence. Just as an interesting call.
well when the narrative writers tell the american public something was audited - one would think it was actually audited not that people recounted the same fraudulent ballots - so when one says they need to audit the equipment - who the f*ck knows that those liars will tell the public next - so yeah - i use the word forensic as in with a scalpel like a medical professional performs an autopsy looking for evidence of how someone died and is trying to find evidence of who murdered them - not just someone saying "ohh yeah - he's dead - next"
63% error rate is not an official number. That's a Ramsfact. Adjudication is a bipartisan process and it was not done on most ballots.
right - it was done behind closed doors without observers
Sure 😉
as military DBA i can tell you, that whenever you enter to 2 DBAS to together you have whole issues more then just numbers.
@Solsheldon, you just advanced to level 1!
Sometimes people die of heart disease rather than murder. If you do one autopsy and you don't find any bullets do you have to keep looking?
yeah you keep looking how did you find out they died of heart disease
Exactly Ramsland violated those voting machines behind closed doors with admin access without observers. He made up whatever he wanted like 63% error rate and is not certified to test election machines for problems