Message from @james j
Discord ID: 793524231442399302
How much voter fraud was there?
Not enough to launch 60 failed lawsuits and pretend like you didn’t lose an election @rip.lul
I'll have to say that's some fucked up imagery.
"A spokesperson for Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar shared a statement with the Washington Examiner that noted that state and federal judges "have sifted through hundreds of pages of unsubstantiated and false allegations and found no evidence of fraud or illegal voting" and asserted that the Republicans' "so-called analysis was based on incomplete data."" https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/confusion-trump-tweets-nonexistent-vote-discrepancy-pennsylvania
And the game of wack-a-mole election fraud allegations continues
who launched 60 failed lawsuits?
more op-eds.
Yeaa, nothing fishy here.
Grifty Don is fishy af. Bilking fanatics is disgraceful. Lose with some dignity ffs.
Courst havent even looked at the evidence. Some op-ed from a modern journo is ass for information
Name a fraud case where the evidence wasn’t looked at
name a case that was.
All of them😂😂😂
Thats an opinion piece.
Well the tough part is actually finding a fraud case being brought into court and not some obscure legal technicality @rip.lul go ahead name a case
SCOTUS for one. on the merits of the case.
then, every other case.
I just mean op-eds. I think we call agree, they are brain worms.
There was no fraud cited
right
@rip.lul find me a actual fraud case that says they are alleging fraud and have evidence
Stand by for goal post shift.
Thats my point.
It's all one big ball of confused sameness to these people.
wow, thats racist.
Your point was the cases being brought forward are fraud cases. The Texas case was not about fraud. It was about states changing rules. They even said that if they took it up they would not grant their remedy. @rip.lul
That clears that up
I want a actual fraud case
I do.
So let’s see a fraud cases where they didn’t look at the alleged evidence of fraud
All of them.
Well the Texas case wasn’t
Name one
Its not about the evidence. Dems are saying 'how dare you try to disinfranchise xxx amount of voters'
There arent any.