> Irrelevant. @Zuluzeit
@yetiCodes Sure it's relevant. Apologies for not asking permission for relevance...but I have questions.

You aren’t allowed to ask questions about things that are unpopular...

Lmao

That’s a great question.
But it’s irrelevant to my question.

Trump could have staged the whole thing

Certified vote counts could be off

Those are not mutually exclusive claims.

I’m just curious if there are any repercussions to the people doing the certification

You are forgiven for your misstep, next time just ask first 😂😂

Hopefully both of our questions will be answered. It was unfortunate that we used the same chat to ask.

@thebrodys Trump is bad is an unpopular statement? Since when? 😂

Depends on where you say such things, I reckon.

https://youtu.be/OxH_WIdvVSM

There are only repercussions to those doing the certification if it turned out that they intentionally committed fraud.

Ah, so mere incompetence is the play to skirt out of repercussions.

These are government workers we're talking about here?

The beauty of capitalism is that you as a twerp can sit there and use your money to buy food without having knowledge of the entire supply chain behind generating all of that food.

A text from Mrs. Busillis.

You know why you don't want government control of healthcare? Take a look at the racial guidelines for covid vaccination.
Now imagine if the govt owned the healthcare field and rationed care based on race.

We still talking about “voter fraud”

Haven't been paying attention.

https://www.ptnewsnetwork.com/pa-republican-lawmakers-analysis-finds-presidential-election-numbers-dont-add-up/

@busillis No one is. They went to that well so goddam many times and kept pulling up buckets of vomit. Tired of picking which ones to lick.

How much voter fraud was there?

Not enough to launch 60 failed lawsuits and pretend like you didn’t lose an election @rip.lul

I'll have to say that's some fucked up imagery.

"A spokesperson for Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar shared a statement with the Washington Examiner that noted that state and federal judges "have sifted through hundreds of pages of unsubstantiated and false allegations and found no evidence of fraud or illegal voting" and asserted that the Republicans' "so-called analysis was based on incomplete data."" https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/confusion-trump-tweets-nonexistent-vote-discrepancy-pennsylvania

And the game of wack-a-mole election fraud allegations continues

who launched 60 failed lawsuits?

more op-eds.

Trump team , Powell team, republicans . All whiney losers @rip.lul

Yeaa, nothing fishy here.

Grifty Don is fishy af. Bilking fanatics is disgraceful. Lose with some dignity ffs.

Courst havent even looked at the evidence. Some op-ed from a modern journo is ass for information

Name a fraud case where the evidence wasn’t looked at

name a case that was.

All of them😂😂😂

Are you reading op-eds again? @james j

Thats an opinion piece.

Well the tough part is actually finding a fraud case being brought into court and not some obscure legal technicality @rip.lul go ahead name a case

SCOTUS for one. on the merits of the case.

@rip.lul I agree that opinions mean nothing. Keep them coming.

then, every other case.

That wasn’t a fraud case @rip.lul

I just mean op-eds. I think we call agree, they are brain worms.

There was no fraud cited