Message from @Livingstone
Discord ID: 793882286222213141
Oh man. They had to release a statement saying the woman in the picture was not Elena parent. She is scrambling and the guy got caught. It sounded like he said I got you covered.
I will want to back this up tonight.
This is just what Trump does @duckherder
@james j yeah that's a totally different issue now isn't it?
No these claims have be scrutinized that can be. This just Trump pretending like there is fraud and people manufacturing claims because they want Trump to win
I disagree. They have done nothing to increase confidence in the outcome
@duckherder look at these witnesses. You think mellisa Carone is a IT expert
90% of military ballots had no paper folds and watermarks are supposed to be semi transparent and they were in front of the print not behind it.
That’s because they just find a excuse to not accept reality @duckherder
Is anyone else watching the Georgia Election hearing right now?
This is the same way religious people prove god. All things is evidence of god @duckherder
The bulk of Powell's theory comes from Russell Ramsland, who is a failed politician that lost his election in 2016 and decided to blame the voting machines instead of accept defeat. He is a grade A conspiracy theorist and his belief that the voting machines can flip votes appears to stem from a fundamental misunderstand of what Ranked Choice Voting is... You can see this from the "forensic report" that his company was hired to do on Dominion machines in MI. (Ranked Choice Voting is a method of voting that is used in some jurisdictions to allow people to rank their candidates in order of preference. If your #1 choice doesn't win, your vote moves to your #2 choice. If #2 doesn't win, it moves to #3 and so on. This requires a special type of ballot that allows voters to indicate their preferences - it is not applicable in any other way.
Since Ramsland appears to be the genesis of the ever changing Venezuela-Smartmatic-Sequoia-Dominion vote flipping (even though flipped votes can't change a paper ballot). You should check him out here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCNkGSk6AxM&start=2004%29
Also, in the Kraken posting last night, I went through it pretty closely and there really isn't anything of substance there. For example, she has a huge section on Scytl and the issues found with their voting system in Switzerland and Australia... Except when you read it, you see that the entire criticism is about online voting - something that was not done in the US at all. Scytl was only used to format already tabulated results into a nice web format. They are not used to tabulate any votes and the tabulated results (which are public, anyways) are sent to their offices in FL. So, it is only there to be purposely misleading. She is expecting that most people won't read it at all.
Yes ma’am.
@Livingstone more unverifiable dribble
@james j I'm not talking about all these other claims. I'm talking specifically about the removal of ballot watchers, and I'm talking about the lack of signature matching. If they did a an actual signature audit I would be much more confident in the results.
Man my voice recognition thing sucks
She. She saw the ballots. This woman literally only counted military ballots. How is it unverifiable if the ballots in question can still be accessed?
For anyone who is interested, https://youtu.be/EjbAFuoQOvo
The two counties that count military ballots separately Cobb I think and Fulton found 80-90% and 93% for Biden respectively.
They were not removed. They got confused when they made an announcement for the workers to leave. These republicans got confused. They were present for the processing and signature matching. The counting did not require them as they did it as the law dictates. Plus they did like a million hand recounts. If something funny happened in the counting process they would have caught in the million recounts. There is nothing on the video that is illegal. It’s just the fantasy of Trump supporters who don’t know what they are seeing and just want it to be fraud. @duckherder
That's not an audit, and it wasn't in Fulton county.
@Livingstone again unverifiable.
That is the one where they found that Gabriel Sterling's address had been used to forge a ballot application though
Wanna see the evidence? Instead of debating
https://youtu.be/EjbAFuoQOvo
@duckherder it’s is better than a audit. A audit is a small sample of ballots . They did the whole complete recount of every vote twice
@BoxyPunkChick that’s not evidence
It’s just tall tales made to fool trump supporters @BoxyPunkChick
Watch it. They're going over the evidence.
@TaLoN132 here's your answer as how Trump supporters react to signature audits ... no matter what you do the fraud is always somewhere you didn't look
This woman is a very ignorant... She doesn't understand how things work at all. The one testifying.
No it's worse than an audit because they kept the observers a hundred feet away from the balance again
F*** this voice recognition!
Lots of people believe differently in voter fraud. Do signed affidavits mean anything????
They just brought up the audit certifying 99% but she said that no one observed them.
The woman testifying right now in the hearing is another example.
@duckherder no you can see on video the actual official republican poll watchers were at the table with the election workers. You are talking about the angry mob yelling stop the count. Those are not official poll watchers.
If you refuse to review the information yourself, then your argument to me is invalid. I am sure I am not alone.
I'm talking about observers at this so-called audit
@duckherder, you just advanced to level 3!