Message from @duckherder
Discord ID: 793886281897476106
Review all information, and come to your conclusions
@BoxyPunkChick only it was reviewed. This lie of the evidence that wasn’t looked at is another lie. What they brought into court was examined no found to be non credible
You think they reviewed anything that fast????
We have been over this but you have selective amnesia @BoxyPunkChick
😂😂😂😂
Nope
I know we have
They are recycling their trash claims for a month . @BoxyPunkChick
You're stubborn and refuse to look at new information
Yeah just like preacher tells you to believe in god you know he exists @BoxyPunkChick
That's why you make people become a broken record.
Yeah more unverifiable information is now evidence
I don't believe in anything I cannot witness and have proven
No it’s because you have no clue what’s going on in court @BoxyPunkChick
Sorry.
Or you don't.
You just think these hearings mean something
They do
You have witnessed people just make shit up for a month
And you believe it
@james j I haven't said anything about any affidavits at all. Concerned about signatures, and very suspicious about what happened on election night in Georgia and Pennsylvania and any other state that stopped abruptly in the middle of the night.
This is an issue with the American education system really
@duckherder it’s all been examined a hundred times
They're showing the evidence to back up the statements. Against the statement has to have proof to back up the claims.
Now I am done with the discussion because I have better things to do right now. Especially when it comes to being so closed minded.
It hasn't really been adjudicated in court.
Why do you choose to argue and not grow?mm
@BoxyPunkChick they are making shit up, you just can’t tell the difference between a claim and evidence. A claim on top of a claim is not evidence.
@BoxyPunkChick you are growing backwards
@duckherder name a specific case
The shredding is in question now. Exhibit hall b was devoted to shredding?
Again, you choose to not even LOOK... Yet you wanna say there isn't proof. Till you watch it and see no proof then argue it. Till then, your argument is nothing to me.
@BoxyPunkChick again I have seen it , it’s just claims on top of claims and a desperate attempt to build and continue the fraud narrative , go look at what they actually presented in court
That is where this matters
Are you watching it with us so you can discuss what is shown instead of just saying it’s not true?
I think it is a good point. Count the number of ballots. Here in GA, ballots are supposed to be lept for 22 months. Count the ballots. Without counting the ballots you can't see if there are the same number kept, but without counting you can't see if they were shredded.
I don't see the issue with being transparent, regardless of who wins.
I have. I suggest you review the hearing. Then talk to me.
@Liberty or Death they counted every ballot twice
This is a juicy hearing.
Sadly he refuses to watch it.