Message from @Ghostdog
Discord ID: 793905095737344039
huh? who is they? and what discrepancies? ... why not just fraud happened and if we don't find evidence it's because they covered their tracks and disposed of all the evidence?
You are just making up conspiracies to justify previous conspiracies @chuchomucho
Most people do. People shift with their view points and align to a party. As the party changes so do the people. That is why Navarro was a Democrat before 1986, an independent from 86-89, a republican from 89-91, back to independent 91-94, to democrat again 94-2018, until 2018 to now he is a republican. I think that is normal. Neither party is perfectly homogenous. And the ideals of the party change with the culture and the economy.
Ok, thats what happens when they are not transperant
People lose trust in the system
So you point is moot @Livingstone a Trump lackie is a Trump lackie , a baby could make that chart for any election. Go see what they presented in court
https://mobile.twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1344074794917109760
Are we canceling Abe now?
They were @chuchomucho no election has ever been this closely analyzed post election
Because this one warranted it. When you have Dems suing all over the country to change the rules right before the election. Then state settling to their demands. It will lead to mistrust of the system which leads to a banana republic.
Ooooohhhh got eeeem
Page 17, paragraph 30 https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315283
@chuchomucho no it’s because Trump had primed his base for months, it’s his defense mechanism for losing
Your past comments do not align with this assertion. You can't say that you want to make sure that there was no cheating, but reject every effort that shows that cheating did not take place.
Did you see my post about the issues with Sidney Powell's case and her reliance on Russ Ramsland's theories?
Ask yourself this... Why have they not supplied any names of people that voted fraudulently? With all this proof, I know of only 3 arrests that have been made for voter fraud - one of them was the guy in PA who voted for his dead grandmother for Trump. One guy was arrested in NC for requesting 50 FL mail-in ballots to be sent to his home. And the other was an idiot in CA that tried to stuff a ballot box to win a local election. With all of these witnesses and every law enforcement agency in the country endorsing Trump, how is it that not one of those officers have been able to find a single person to arrest for massive voter fraud? Are the law enforcement officers in on it, too?
When you have Dems suing all over the country to change the rules right before the election. Then state settling to their demands. It will lead to mistrust of the system which leads to a banana republic.
When you have Dems suing all over the country to change the rules right before the election. Then state settling to their demands. It will lead to mistrust of the system which leads to a banana republic.
The state was considered indefinitely confined. This was later decided erroneous. The reason being that an absentee ballot in the state of Wisconsin did not require a photo ID. By declaring counties or the state or even simply encouraging people to get an absentee ballot and say that they are indefinitely confined was found to be erroneous. The issue is that all of those votes were cast. Their validity is in question. There were mistakes made but nothing can be done now.
@Livingstone they are attacking the election process not showing evidence of fraud. Further more they could have brought this up well before the election (months) yet they only brought up their disappoint of the rules after the election.
Yes the Dems are
@chuchomucho, you just advanced to level 9!
Last I checked, it doesn't take a freezer that can maintain -160C temperatures and the medical training to reconstitute the vaccine safely in order to vote. Just sayin'
So because our leaders failed to fix this ahead of time, its our fault?
They are the ones putting the validity into question @Livingstone
They did bring it up before the election. The oral argument was submitted on September 29, 2020.
@chuchomucho republicans only cared after they lost
OK russia last four tyears
Im not republican, I got shafted
@chuchomucho Russia had nothing to do other election feud
but they had built distrust for 4 years
You said the dems brought up that case @chuchomucho
DNC
No in the election process itself @chuchomucho
That would be appropriate if that happened like... 8 weeks ago. Instead, Biden has indulged Trump the entire time. And unlike now, there was actual proof of Russian involvement that was confirmed by Trump himself. He just denied colluding with them. Otherwise, why would he have signed the EO about foreign involvement and started CISA?
they spied on a president, and tried to impeach over false charges, even calling to remove him outright, they would never do election fraud lol
It was filed on the 14 th of December . These rules were changed months before @Livingstone
We'll see... It would take both chambers voting to uphold the objection. Somehow, I don't see the House doing that.