Message from @Lorinda
Discord ID: 793962383256584193
I do question the integrity of politicians who are extremely wealthy.
All that I know to do is to listen to as many people as I can and try to verify what they say to the best of my ability. I do not trust mainstream media. My credible source list has dwindled. I trust people like you more than any “new’s station.”
@Lorinda, you just advanced to level 3!
Holy cr@p... I am watching the GA hearing and they had these supposed data scientists that should be ashamed of themselves. They completely misrepresented the flow of data and again are trying to assert that the NYT data feed is an accurate representation of election night data and that the tabulation occurs at Scytl (as opposed to tabulated data being sent to Scytl for web presentation). Since both of these assumptions are incorrect and they are the basis for their analysis, it invalidates everything else they claim. One of the first steps of any legitimate data analysis is verifying that the data you have is actually sound - they obviously did not... And, yet, they state that they have "proof" of fraud. It is absolutely ridiculous.
If I had more time, I'd make it my near term mission to expose them for the frauds they are. The sad thing is non-technical people will hear that some expert proved something that they hope is true.
Everything they said actually makes sense. It can be proved or disproved-just like the allegations of ballots being shredded. It really wasn’t all that technical.
I wonder how these people will be able to gain employment after all of this?
The typical tactic is to completely misrepresent what the data means. Idk I do but, really???
Utterly and completely misrepresent.
What some of these people are doing is shameful.
It isn't meant to hold up in court. It's meant to hit precisely the mark that it does every time. Observe.
It doesn't make sense when you personally understand the processes it makes sense in the context that they're presenting it.p
It's like the 68% of faulty ballots....
That whole deal is just damn lie.
The court of public opinion.
68% of the ballots were not able to be counted by the machines but the ballots were not uncounted.
It is technical when they say the machines are hooked up to the internet, when they're actually not.
It's like these people have never known what a local sever is.
Doesn't matter. They said it out loud. That's all they needed to do.
I don't necessarily believe that when you have people that are so-called experts mischaracterizing the reality of what's actually happening it leads people off course.
She's some part-time it person.
People in modern society have been trained to trust experts doctors attorneys so on and so forth...
I don't know some of the s***'s been looked at pretty hard.
And they're not finding a lot.
I've personally looked into Pennsylvania there's no way that there can be that many faked up mail and ballots it's just impossible.
He's referring to the woman in @Zuluzeit 's image. One of the witnesses.
@TaLoN132 has looked at many of these states in detail and the federal laws in this just not like what they say it is it's just not.
@busillis, you just advanced to level 45!
Trump is doing this to lay down cover to try to take the electors in Congress and or break up the GOP. @Lorinda
Or both
..
And it's actually doing great harm.
No argument there.
What harm? GOP sucks.
Never let the factual details get in the way of a good story
Irrevocable harm