Message from @codyhere2004
Discord ID: 794315518772903936
16 by relationship is way too open to predatory people.
It's more nuanced though.
Yeah... I remember what it was like as a teenager, but I also have the perspective of a parent.
Then I think you'd like Washington's system? (Though again, make by relationship 18)
Another stellar expert for the Trump team: https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/31/22208033/jovan-pulitzer-cuecat-georgia-election-fraud-flimflam
The q cat that's very old...
There was a way to rewire it to output plain text if memory serves me.
And then it was still a piece of shit.
I don't even remember this product at all... I watched more of his "testimony" yesterday than I would like to have. He was such a condescending prick and he was absolutely trying to deflect any time anyone asked him to clarify something that was obviously questionable. It's always easy for me to tell when someone is BSing on a technical issue.
A chemical analysis of the paper might tell you something.
Even paper from the same plant would probably have some kind of different signature per the batch.
IJFMTS-3-2-.pdf. A scientific method for forensic examination of paper
It would probably cost a fortune.
So basically they hacked their competitors.... that is messed up... of course who is buying tickets right now?? I dont go out of my house without a hazmat suit
It's way screwed up
Another snarky op Ed from the left media
“This guy did something silly once, therefore trump is stupid for depending on him.” Classic 2020 headline.
This guy was unsuccessful at something one time and trump is a total clown for using his help’
No... I formed my opinion of him from his ridiculous testimony.
As with all testimony, you must consider the source and the substance of what they provide.
Journalism is dead. Pseudo intellectual cancer. Those who write and those who read it. Brain worms
Most OpEd's are snarky on some level... People tend to not get worked up about things that are relatively benign.
I’m not sure what your point is.
Serious question: why form an opinion of him? If he can prove something beyond a reasonable doubt, does it make anything he shows less true?
Point is just blindly follow 🟠 🤡 since everything else is lies.
At one point, I considered a career in journalism. 6 years of study... There are different standards for opinion pieces.
The profession ranked #6 in rate of psychopathy 😆
Did you watch his "testimony" yesterday?
I’m glad you decided to use your skill for something not so.... cancerous
Where does Software/Data Architect fall on the list?
No. I have no clue about what’s shown. Only commenting on headlines that are overt propaganda.
Good question. Don’t remember seeing it in the top 10 though lol
You said it chairman
It is one thing if someone is able to succinctly present factual evidence. People who are competent tend to be able to field questions without belittling the people asking the question and/or cutting them off in mid sentence and trying to divert to an unrelated subject. And then what he was trying to assert was largely speculation and innuendo. It lacked any real substance.
Journos are teething troglodytes