This statement would be a lie.

No, you heard sound you didn't comprehend and then formulated a conclusion based on your lack of comprehension.

@Maw same. It is gaslighting at this point, I reckon.

LOL WHAT

Sup

What I stated, and stated clearly.

> No, you heard sound you didn't comprehend and then formulated a conclusion based on your lack of comprehension.
@Whithers That is exactly what these fanatical election fraud 'witnesses' are doing. Well said.

"never happened. You just didn't understand his words." I don't think I've felt more gaslit in my life.

I gave evidence if it not being right-wing, and you simply wave it away. And that was then. They have moved a bit to the left since.

Yes, because the methodology is looking at coverage of Trump, this is not effectively being 'right wing'.

Fox is owned by a mega lib

The methodology is broken.

I was referring to the link below that.

Ok Fox isn't right wing. Lmao

Its center left which seems right wing to the commie left

WHAT

omg

Fox was always more centrist with a few shows that leaned Right. The fact that the President is not actually a conservative, but is instead a moderate, seems to be missed by most.

That speaks to how radical some people must be.

No, Fox is not right wing. Newsmax is right wing. OANN is right wing. Fox is center right.

I don't understand that point. Looking at coverage of Trump is an action, not a methodology.

No one believes Fox is not right wing. No one will be duped into thinking it either. Next.

Saying 'trump bad' isn't exclusive to the left, therefore it's not proper methodology.

It could simply mean the difference of being pro-establishment or not.

Your mirth does not mean that it's right-wing.

To someone standing at the Left edge of the galaxy the center looks to be right.

@Maw They know. It's standard doubling down instead of admitting. Next.

There is the fact that the corporatists, Democrats, and Marxists are all opposed to the United States being a sovereign nation built on Lockean principle, and so they oppose President Trump.

Sorry, still doesn't make sense. What's not proper methodology?

Imagine wanting to objectively define something as subjective as left vs right

@The Mongler, you just advanced to level 6!

> Imagine wanting to objectively define something as subjective as left vs right
@The Mongler Done. That was easy.

Coverage of a political candidate, it being negative or positive, is not a unique characteristic to right/left dynamics.

I don't think either label applies. People often don't fit neat categories. I'd say he's conservative in some respects, and moderate in others.

Once we started letting the cia set up shop in our media we got on that propaganda time

All thought is subjective. No one thinks outside their own perception. The standard is well considered conception. Objectivity does not exist.

Hint: You can tell by the sheer volume of Fox broadcasters invoking the term 'the left'. Gaslight fail, guys. Sorry.

"Objectivity does not exist."
So that claim is itself not objectively true!

I don't have any figures on that, so I can't dispute nor agree.

How can you say you know Fox isn't right wing if you don't watch fox news.

Other than flawed methodologies suggesting it's... somehow center-left.