theres enough states with republican legislatures to win

Faithless electors depends on the states in question.

I mean house reps and senators

A few states flat-out disallow faithless electors.

And their votes are forfeited, then someone else gets to become the elector.

i dont think any of the swing states have those laws

more republican legislatures would only matter if it goes to House Delegations, no?

*state legislatures

the states decide who they vote for

im not talking about congresss/senate

I also disagreed with them using TX's choice to not go with Dominion as proof that they are not secure. I read the evaluations from TX and they were addressing deficiencies in the Dominion system per their RFP/RFQ. They did not make any claims about rejecting Dominion because they could flip votes.

yeah the dominion thing would be hard to prove unless they couldve seized a machine in one of these dubious counties

and checked the code and logs

but, if its designed in such a way to be able to commit fraud, i doubt it would have logs of such an event

From what I've been able to tell, they all have had paper ballot backups. No need to check longs, just do a hand recount.

I think it's purposely built to not log such events

depends on what you can pull from it's memory drive.

hand recount when only 70% of the ballots are found?

I can't say anything about that kind of hardware, but on a normal hard drive, "deleting" something only hides it from view and still keeps a trace./shadow of the file on the disc.

i think it was michigan where they said only 70% of the ballots are recountable or something

One of the deficiencies in TX was that Dominion couldn't use non-sequential vote identifiers. They didn't want people to be able to figure out how someone voted because they knew the order that people voted on that machine. Having sequential identifiers makes it harder to replace paper votes.

it's why some people tend to destroy old hard drives instead of selling them.

@Adam135 if it doesnt log it in the first place theres nothing to delete

if its purpose built software it can obfuscate anything

cant really know without examining source code

I'd like to see someone explain source code to a judge lmao

lol

The finding in TX was that the data was in the system log, but not in the Dominion application log that the election officials had access to. As a result, it took an administrator type to dump and sift thru the system log to find any of those types of events. The data is there, just not readily available.

It's in the system logs.

@TaLoN132 per finding in tx on a version that is not the same as the current

im not saying the machines are or arent purpose built for fraud

i'm saying it is impossible to know without having the source code of the version used on election night

Twitter is really getting sloppy, blocking links to Powell's lawsuit and suspending the account of Doug Mastriano. It doesn't look good.

@ImNotGas This was last year - v5.5A - if that helps. It was a deficiency identified from their evaluation of v5.5. Dominion was not able to make the change in time. What version is MI using?

twitter doesnt care

if they didn't, they wouldn't lift a finger to begin with.

@TaLoN132 didnt they say it got patched the night before election?

@Adam135 i mean they dont care if they look bad, if trump doesnt somehow pull a win out of this they will double down on their efforts

I've long since quit twitter and moved to parler

@ImNotGas I have heard several rumors. There were some accounts of machines that were not working that may have received a patch to get them back up and running. Whether it was a new patch or someone had forgotten to patch those machine before, I don't know.

I know people give it flak for "breeding right wing cultism" but parler is pretty much indifferent to all opinions