Message from @markmen
Discord ID: 785716050661736459
Perfect I'm already very good at talking to myself so I won't even miss a beat.
Robert thanks for all the detail you provide thoroughly enjoy it!
@markmen, you just advanced to level 4!
assume it's a skill that makes you a good trial lawyer
I'm not getting the 'there should be investigations' thing, like there are no investigations.
Also strange is the 'I have 0 faith in elections'...unless fraud is proven. That doesn't seem odd?
I'm in the camp of elections shouldn't be overturned unless fraud or the like is proven ... allegations and doubt aren't enough in my mind ... but certainly those allegations should be investigated and brought before a court to judge their validity
Yes.
Big fan of visualization, which includes talking to myself. Definitely helps.
@meglide But there is this constant smuggling in of shifting the burden of proof.
Prove the absence of existence.
not for the courts I don't think ... PA Supreme Court being the exception
I'm talking about the general populace. The courts do what they do.
Thanks meglide!
Glad to have you here!
@Zuluzeit you are right hard to prove something does not exist. The best way, I think, is to be transparent and open, so far I haven't seen that to extent I'd like to see it, which is to be expected. I think the process is largely working as it should, and we may see more if a Judge somewhere grants it.
I too would love to see it aired out. How awful are these lawyers that they can't get something undeniably hearable put together?
The Constitutional arguments are much more over the mark, as we are seeing.
But I hear you.
yeah Powell today was "throw everything at the wall and see what sticks" and then if it didn't stick the first time, throw it at the wall again
@Zuluzeit lady (if memory serves me correct) in AZ was better, ask for discovery, get something ask for more, very specific, straight to the point
If nothing else, I would pay to see Mellissa Carone on an actual witness stand.
Kelli Ward, and the AZ Supreme Court is going to hear the case, I saw.
@Zuluzeit is that #sassyface?
Hahaha yep
No one will let her near one but that would make it all worthwhile to me.
I'd chip in for that
Guiliani threw the kitchen sink. Powell went for grand conspiracy. Difficult to prove.
I'd love to do the direct examination
yeah PA, AZ and NV are interesting to me ... GA not so much
easy to dismiss ... especially when she brought a state case to a federal court
Seems like direct would need to be somewhat focused and contained. Her range seems dangerous.
Yea Sidney / Giuliani have been largely ineffective and the kraken promise with no delivery really set a bad tone.
@Zuluzeit I didn't say anything about winning
Hahahahaha
Priceless
@RobertGrulerEsq did you hear the "latches" applied to Powell's argument in GA today? I thought it might actually the correct application
So the 305th Special Intelligence Battalion will have no bearing on any of these suits?
I find that hard to believe