And I'm almost certain that was the intent.

Hence the sunglasses, levitating, and business suit.

@ankiwo hola

we had a discussion on it this morning in <#771201221145919499> and here's the short version of my take: there's a link that has this on standing - "Constitutional Standards: Injury in Fact, Causation, and Redressability.—Although the Court has been inconsistent, it has now settled upon the rule that, “at an irreducible minimum,” the constitutional requisites under Article III for the existence of standing are that the plaintiff must personally have: 1) suffered some actual or threatened injury; 2) that injury can fairly be traced to the challenged action of the defendant; and 3) that the injury is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision." ... I think its #3) for SCOTUS on the TX case, there's no constitutional remedy that changes the result all based on the electors clause in the constitution https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/20-substantial-interest-standing.html

HAH! I just did a search of my name and not one picture came up. Stealth!

Now try a reverse image search.

I suspect my reverse image search would render some results.

I only know of two images of me on the net at all. I am not completely off. Just very very limited.

Charlie Kirk show on Rumble depicts Ji Jinping as Winnie the Pooh.

How to get your platform banned from China: Allow saying things about controversial topics, and talk about "Tankman" or "Winnie the Pooh"

"1986"

LOL

Not actually a joke, sadly.

Question on Trump’s executive order - can’t Biden (if inaugurated) just create an executive order to undo Trump’s EO? Especially to get the heat off China so that Biden family 10% holdings is not compromised

@Maw you mean 1989?

Probably.

86 was chernobyl.

89 was the wall

Wait what? Pooh bear is universally lovable.

I'm talking about Tiananmen Square.

yes. same year as the wall

Talk about that is usually banned in China.

same type of operation, but failed in china.

Don't think they care about the wall.

not at all, its just that it didnt work in bejing, what worked in Berlin

same year

89

"winds of change"

But yes, if you allow people to say such a controversial year, usually China goes: "no"

"ban everything from them."

ya, 1989 is their 1933

Yes, Biden can repeal a Presidential Exec.Order. But he won't repeal that one. Kamala will have the FBI manufacture false evidence of Russian operations among her political rivals and use it to impose Martial Law and incarcerate Conservatives.

Like, I imagine already at this point, Chinese people versed with using the internet already know about 1989.

I don't know why they keep censoring it.

They didn’t do such a good job of presenting very good “evidence” during the Russian collusion allegations the first time around

Especially his Pooh likeness.

They don't care how good the allegations are. They own the swamp.

Like, I'm very much happy I can joke around with calling Trump the great cheeto-in-chief.

@Maw same as with some countries in europe, things may be very upopular to discuss, so unpopular they are illegal.

It certainly doesn't happen in Germany, no sir.

😄