Message from @eclair088

Discord ID: 789332631275175976


2020-12-18 03:23:19 UTC  

I didn't say that? I don't think the guy who did is Libertarian.

2020-12-18 03:23:21 UTC  

I don't have the sword of death. Hand it to me and then test my resolve.

2020-12-18 03:23:39 UTC  

It is better to know how to use the sword but keep it sheathed

2020-12-18 03:23:44 UTC  

Hence why it was in quotations, and if you didn't say that, then it's not aimed at you.

2020-12-18 03:23:52 UTC  

I am not a libertarian.

2020-12-18 03:23:56 UTC  

> I don't have the sword of death. Hand it to me and then test my resolve.
@Whithers Nah, I'm good. Will continue to be, as well. Good luck with that, though.

2020-12-18 03:24:00 UTC  

Ayn Rand?

2020-12-18 03:24:20 UTC  

Yes. Alyssa Rosenbaum.

2020-12-18 03:24:34 UTC  

I'll make you a sword of death if you pay me for it

2020-12-18 03:24:35 UTC  

So if you define fascism as authoritarian, are you insinuating you must enact fascism to fight fascism?

2020-12-18 03:24:55 UTC  

I think fascism is authoritarian?

2020-12-18 03:25:11 UTC  

Fan...

2020-12-18 03:25:13 UTC  

It's not in the academic term.

2020-12-18 03:25:21 UTC  

Wouldn't have guessed it.

2020-12-18 03:25:27 UTC  

There is a big difference, though, between authoritarian and authoritative.

2020-12-18 03:25:29 UTC  

hello, I'm new here 👋

2020-12-18 03:25:40 UTC  

you joined at a great time

2020-12-18 03:25:45 UTC  

@RJ Welcome!

2020-12-18 03:25:47 UTC  

watch the show

2020-12-18 03:25:52 UTC  

Hi @RJ

2020-12-18 03:26:04 UTC  

Maybe it will be there tomorrow.

2020-12-18 03:26:23 UTC  

"democrats are the real fascists" "no you" 'NO, YOU" ad infinitum

2020-12-18 03:26:30 UTC  

Doubtful. It needs to have academic purpose, and diluting words into synonyms has no academic purpose.

2020-12-18 03:26:41 UTC  

I do not define fascism as authoritarian. I define it as a theology of revolution which uses the pretense of private ownership as a gilded cage for state regulation for a Marxist agenda. While it is authoritarian, that is not its principle crime. Its principle crime is that it is a secular theocracy which is opposed to nature and nature's G-d.

2020-12-18 03:26:45 UTC  

Fish

2020-12-18 03:27:01 UTC  

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism
a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

2020-12-18 03:27:25 UTC  

Oh Ken, don't you go changing.

2020-12-18 03:27:26 UTC  

You or me? If me, no. I find AR disgusting.

2020-12-18 03:27:51 UTC  

I'm watching tonight's show now.
Anyone have a link to the CBSN interview with Herridge talking about DNI Ratcliffe???

2020-12-18 03:27:54 UTC  

Again, I said academic.

2020-12-18 03:28:01 UTC  

I never will.

2020-12-18 03:28:08 UTC  

Merriam Webster is not academic.

2020-12-18 03:28:13 UTC  

We are a constitutional republic so as long as we keep the pressure on idiots like Newsom and Garcetti, we should be able to avoid the autocratic natures. However, the authoritarian is likely different than autocratic?

2020-12-18 03:28:22 UTC  

Dubious, It requires a scholastic want, and adulterating language into synonyms lacks learned objectives.

2020-12-18 03:28:29 UTC  

I have a very hard time making a case for the right putting 'the nation or race (or anything) above the individual'...

2020-12-18 03:28:31 UTC  

Yes they are not the same.

2020-12-18 03:28:43 UTC  

Please define it. I am not going for academic, I am just trying to get a definition so we can argue about fascism better

2020-12-18 03:28:57 UTC  

Mahmood

2020-12-18 03:29:29 UTC  

Slippery slope. Don't bite.

2020-12-18 03:30:35 UTC  

The abstract sense which I have for facism seems to be where the greater good (nation) is placed over the individual. Not always race like Italian or German, but perhaps a diverse population could do it if it is ideological. ... And then they stamp out freedom of speech. But it has some leader who decides everything.

2020-12-18 03:30:50 UTC  

Although fascist parties and movements differed significantly from one another, they had many characteristics in common, including extreme militaristic nationalism, contempt for electoral democracy and political and cultural liberalism, a belief in natural social hierarchy and the rule of elites, and the desire to create a Volksgemeinschaft (German: “people’s community”), in which individual interests would be subordinated to the good of the nation. At the end of World War II, the major European fascist parties were broken up, and in some countries (such as Italy and West Germany) they were officially banned."