🤪

You're correct integral to being a teacher is being a student

🤺

> No. Being American does not grant one the capacity to be both a boson and a fermion. You are wrong.
@Whithers inapt drivel.

All persons are ethically equally obligated before the law. Only the Right values that truth.

Marxism is a secular theology of revolution. It is not enough to not vote for it. It is necessary that this heresy be eradicated for the protection of the species.

Marxists tend to be Bolsheviks, not actually whatever the Communist Manifesto said. ... The end state was never described by Marx, though. ... If ya look at how we place the distribution of private/producing property and all that into the hands of the free market... America achieved communism, because we misunderstood it thanks to Lenin and other idiots going around singing Imagine. 😛

True. All Marxist endeavors end in Fascism, such as the Fascist state of the PRC.

CCP?

Yes, People's Republic of China: 中华人民共和国 or Zhōnghuá Rénmín Gònghéguó.

How about Hegelist? America?

As someone with visual impairments, or disabled from birth, I have more needs than the normal person. However, in the court of law, I should be seen as a normal person. ... Unfortunately, no one considers the extra hurdles that we face and how that changes us differently than the normal able person. ... So we do have differences deeper than that which already makes us unique in race, sex, and national origin. ... But, we are still persons.

Right to war?

So if your using the definition of fascism to mean authoritarian.

No one has the right to take something of another's. So war is off the table. ... Unless it is a pre-emptive strike like Israel's Six Day War.

> Marxism is a secular theology of revolution. It is not enough to not vote for it. It is necessary that this heresy be eradicated for the protection of the species.
@Whithers You don't have the stones. That's why you're so angry.

What's: "It is not enough to not vote for it. It is necessary that this heresy be eradicated for the protection of the species."

That isn't very libertarian.

Examining stones?

(Quite the opposite)

Marx and Hegel both failed to acknowledge the human. Humans are not in consensus rational, but rather are rationalizing. This is the principle which renders the efforts of Hegel, Marx, and Rosenbaum mental masturbation without any possible satisfactory climax.

Facism is whatever the anti-fascists have been doing this whole year.

I didn't say that? I don't think the guy who did is Libertarian.

I don't have the sword of death. Hand it to me and then test my resolve.

It is better to know how to use the sword but keep it sheathed

Hence why it was in quotations, and if you didn't say that, then it's not aimed at you.

I am not a libertarian.

> I don't have the sword of death. Hand it to me and then test my resolve.
@Whithers Nah, I'm good. Will continue to be, as well. Good luck with that, though.

Ayn Rand?

Yes. Alyssa Rosenbaum.

I'll make you a sword of death if you pay me for it

So if you define fascism as authoritarian, are you insinuating you must enact fascism to fight fascism?

I think fascism is authoritarian?

Fan...

It's not in the academic term.

Wouldn't have guessed it.

There is a big difference, though, between authoritarian and authoritative.

hello, I'm new here 👋

you joined at a great time

@RJ Welcome!

watch the show