Message from @Archiver✿(Fake Art Open)
Discord ID: 793141832019738644
Back later.
Right.
Later..
@dnindustry
`2nd the actual source of the explosion is further down the st than the rv. The blast radius seems rather elongated looking at the after math and very charred.`
According to what? A video that doesn't seem to understand dust gets in the way of blasts? Because I can guarantee you dust does, and it's provable in this case that the explosion came from the RV, I've done it numerous times.
`Do you seriously believe it was a hydrogen based source? Wouldn't there be detectable radiation if detonated and not destroyed.`
What? My dude, literally no one said this was... like a nuke or something? I'm not even sure what you're suggesting. Hydrogen bombs kind of are outdated, and you know -- that would have leveled the city.
`I would believe there was something along those lines in the vehicle that's why it was destroyed. Could said nano H device cause an emp to scale enough damage`
My dude, if there was an EMP field the lights and TVs wouldn't be functioning literally 75 feet away from the epicenter.
I please ask people to think about this sort of thing logically, rather than just recite dribble you hear online.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/772982351520333824/792946873932709918/unknown.png Here you go, look at the shadows and you can tell where the source of the explosion is.
Sources close to the investigation have divulged to me that the missile was using a psychological operation stealth technology.
Propaganda rolled up in a psychological operation rewrapped and rolled again in propaganda.
It looks like the powers fucking up because a transformer tripped or was destroyed... But I don't have any corroborating anonymous sources.
Emp would fry electronics not in a faraday cage
There's no way that was an EMP. Even if it were, it would have knocked out all these cameras that took footage of the aftermath such as the one in the above post.
What are you trying to fry?
And here you go, you'd hear something like this if a missile was literally burning fuel before it struck a target (which is required for burn trails.
I'm just asking...
That's a pretty stealthy missile...
Maybe I should turn up the volume...
If someone is suggesting that the soot pattern on the ground indicates that there was a rocket... There's no way that a rocket would have took such a parallel trajectory to the ground.
I don't even think it's mostly soot, looks like damp gravel because literally water lines were broken and spraying water everywhere.
And yes, they usually have an AOA of about 45-60 degrees.
Unless it was a javelin... Those are almost 90 degrees on their targets.
Have you ever heard of a shape charge
He has like an 80 liter fuel tank in the RV.
Of course it's going to make a huge fireball.
In the Beirut embassy bombing they used acetylene tanks...
acetylene is some rough stuff!! But, yes I've heard of shaped charges. Having dealt with C4 and other plastic explosives in the Army. I doubt that's what was used here.
It was low-velocity explosives.
Tannerite or ANFO.
It was felt really far away. It makes sense though if he had experience with explosives
@Archiver✿(Fake Art Open), you just advanced to level 7!
What makes you so sure?
Damage.
And lack of damage to people.
Did you not see the gaping hole that was made in the side of the ATT building?
Sure.
Did you are across the street too
Yep.
Tannerite, you'd have to have a couple hundred pounds of it.
About 200-400 lb by my estimates.
He was riding heavy. Shocks were down low