me

Good night peeps

Night doc!

Nite

Nashville, TN explosion.
1. What gradients to the 3 injured people? Were they injured from the gun shots or explosion?
2. Nothing was left of the RV after it exploded. BUT officials were able to collect DNA samples? EVEN if they were able to collect DNA sample, it would have been so degraded.
3. What was AT&T press statement?
4. So the "guy" has end stage cancer and his blowing a specific building and himself instead of spending time with gf, and other love ones?

@skye, you just advanced to level 3!

Gradients= happened*

2. Yes.No.
4. Yes.

so some states are not following CDC guidance on vaccination priority and I think I agree with them: https://www.businessinsider.com/florida-texas-vaccinating-people-65-and-older-covid-2020-12

https://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2020/12/28/cdr-utahns-75-and-over-moved-up-in-priority-for-covid-19-vaccine-essential-workers-moved-down/#.X-uM2dhKiUk

idea comes from this chart, found at this link:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9086303/CDC-advisory-panel-changes-guidelines-prioritize-75s-COVID-vaccine.html

this is further supported by the CDC's own data:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/burden.html

Healthcare workers and nursing home residents are getting vaccinated now. The second group recommended by the CDC includes essential workers such as teachers and grocery store workers. What Texas, Florida and now Utah are proposing is to put elderly people above the age of 65 in front of essential workers such as those teachers and grocery store workers. Given the charts above I think would agree with these states over the CDC.

My Grandma, lives in UT. She’s been stuck in her house since this all started

UT is one of the states doing right by your Grandma, IMHO

Shutting things down and keeping people locked in, is more detrimental

The mental health stuff she’s dealing with because of being a prisoner in her house...

I’ve never seen my Grandma, like this

I meant concerning the vaccine ... I'm unaware of what the "lockdown" requirements are in Utah

Oh, yes I do think they should get out first

My bad

I live in AR. When I hear her talk about UT restrictions, it’s like she’s living in a whole different country

Deal with this... https://www.ft.com/content/e73fdd69-1fee-4886-b299-959ce9647151

Cry me a river

In the article: "But the only real bulwark against these sorts of pardons — short of amending the constitution to remove the power to issue them — is to avoid electing rotten presidents." ... strange they didn't want to compare Clinton's pardons with Trump's

I wonder what requirement criteria did NY follow when they put aoc in front of the line for vaccination administration?

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/17/capitol-hill-first-coronavirus-vaccine-448008

Hahaha. That's meaningfully funny

@RobertGrulerEsq @FaithJoy Great show tonight, we're getting some long ones lately! (Definitely a fan of those!) Also was really nice to see you on Uncivil Law's show last night. I'm going to get an early night's sleep as it's been quite the long day. Have a good night you two.

I think the why question needs more att ention at times.

In the case l f trump in Texas lawsut. When one member from each state came put put there vote in they were locked out by the police they would be considered unidentified and should be aloud to be added to the vote. Imo

So... I'm new.... And this will be off topic, January 6th, who's going? Lol

Speaking of Texas. What will happen next with lawsuit were essentially its Trump sueing,I think pennsylvania

was thinking about it.."its going to be wild" yes

I can't believe their isn't some hashtag to match travelers with truckers going east. Nobody I know except 1 buddy is going

@huntingkc, you just advanced to level 1!

its a big trip to plan this late

The upside is, no matter how many people show up, it will be declared (and accepted) as the most tremendous attendance in history.

@osok anybody want to go , shoot me a message I'll give contact of group in ohio going from Columbus

@Maw @RobertGrulerEsq hey I’m late to the show watching the part abt strict scrutiny and cuomo’s EO. They say stopping the spread of covid-19 is the compelling interest of the government but you don’t spread covid 19. Covid 19 is the disease caused by the virus SARS Cov 2. So you can spread SARS Cov 2 but not covid 19. My question is, is that relevant to the lawsuit? Is it reasonable to claim the issue as moot given that you literally can’t spread covid 19? I’m a scientist so the distinction is obvious to me but I’m curious what that mean w respect to the law. Ik language is super important when it comes to the law.

that is why i was thinking about going just not in a RV lol