Message from @Massie1223
Discord ID: 794624403262537748
So not examining them is proof there was no fraud?
Basically your oligarchic overlords have spoken any other dissent please keep it to yourself.
Thanks for playing @Massie1223
@Massie1223 what is there to examine. Do any of these Trump supporters even know what a forensic audit would entail. The last “forensic.” Audit was done by a car mechanic that lied about being a military intelligence officer.
They did two full hand counts. This takes the machines completely out of the equation
There is a ton of new evidence. We know.
Not exactly... At can determine if extra ballots were put into the pool... And it also can't determine if ballots marked by a machine were put into the pool... But never mind any of that.
If those things are actually possible.
Idk...
@busillis no it can’t , all these machines do is count the physical ballots.
Not true some can Mark ballots...
Doesn’t matter in a full hand recount
If there are questionable ballots they get eyes on them during the counting process
There you go playing voting expert.... If it's true that some machines can actually Mark ballots how did the hand recounters know whether they were marked by a machine or not?
The machine is now the human
Human interaction is typically worse than machine interaction.
Machines don’t mark ballots
They just count them
They don’t make coffee
They don’t do anything but count and tally
If you don’t like the machine you just use the hand recount to verify against the machine
There is nothing to keep to yourself @Massie1223
It’s all manufactured garbage because Trump lost
Hard counts are not examinations of electronic interference
It takes the machine out of the equation @Massie1223
There is no electronic interface with physical hand counting
The machine is always part of the equation
Not if you don’t use them
Which is what they did
True
They did two full hand recounts
No machine involvement
You're incorrect the voting machines can fill out ballots through accessibility mode please see the presentation at the link posted above.
At the link above looking under the accessibility link..m
And just to be clear I'm not saying this is what happened@james j I'm just saying you're incorrect about the machines that ability to Mark ballots.
It is suggested there are thousand of paper ballots that were submitted utilizing criminal intent, deceased, prisoners, double votes, forged votes. That can't be verified by recounting