https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10222974028874560&id=1094125480

@Massie1223 it isn’t

None of this dominion accusations amount to anything

We'll see

You can see it right now @Massie1223

Same huckster different story , this video was made four years ago about the new “star” witness in the hearing An other know conspiracy theorist https://youtu.be/WcvEp9Dhifc. This was made of him 4 year ago @Massie1223

It appears you are trying to run interference and prevent the truth getting to Americans

Robert, thanks for making the complicated understandable to the average guy. Great job!! Much success in this new year.

No I’m just bringing a dose of reality to these fantasies. Look up the guy yourself. @Massie1223

Nothing he is saying is substantial to showing “there was mass fraud”

While that's true the ballots can be forensically examined.

But forensic document examining can't make a hundred percent determination.

Nothing in science is 100%.

I’m just talking about the most recent “expert” witness. So far we have had a car mechanic, a podcaster, a temp, and now a know huckster whose reputation goes back some time

So not examining them is proof there was no fraud?

Basically your oligarchic overlords have spoken any other dissent please keep it to yourself.

Thanks for playing @Massie1223

@Massie1223 what is there to examine. Do any of these Trump supporters even know what a forensic audit would entail. The last “forensic.” Audit was done by a car mechanic that lied about being a military intelligence officer.

They did two full hand counts. This takes the machines completely out of the equation

There is a ton of new evidence. We know.

Not exactly... At can determine if extra ballots were put into the pool... And it also can't determine if ballots marked by a machine were put into the pool... But never mind any of that.

If those things are actually possible.

Idk...

@busillis no it can’t , all these machines do is count the physical ballots.

Not true some can Mark ballots...

Doesn’t matter in a full hand recount

If there are questionable ballots they get eyes on them during the counting process

There you go playing voting expert.... If it's true that some machines can actually Mark ballots how did the hand recounters know whether they were marked by a machine or not?

The machine is now the human

Human interaction is typically worse than machine interaction.

Machines don’t mark ballots

They just count them

They don’t make coffee

They don’t do anything but count and tally

I will not keep it to myself.

If you don’t like the machine you just use the hand recount to verify against the machine

There is nothing to keep to yourself @Massie1223

It’s all manufactured garbage because Trump lost

Hard counts are not examinations of electronic interference

It takes the machine out of the equation @Massie1223

There is no electronic interface with physical hand counting