Message from @james j

Discord ID: 794624015376318495


2021-01-01 17:01:11 UTC  

It appears you are trying to run interference and prevent the truth getting to Americans

2021-01-01 17:06:34 UTC  

Robert, thanks for making the complicated understandable to the average guy. Great job!! Much success in this new year.

2021-01-01 17:42:11 UTC  

No I’m just bringing a dose of reality to these fantasies. Look up the guy yourself. @Massie1223

2021-01-01 17:42:50 UTC  

Nothing he is saying is substantial to showing “there was mass fraud”

2021-01-01 17:43:20 UTC  

While that's true the ballots can be forensically examined.

2021-01-01 17:44:10 UTC  

But forensic document examining can't make a hundred percent determination.

2021-01-01 17:44:31 UTC  

Nothing in science is 100%.

2021-01-01 17:45:40 UTC  

I’m just talking about the most recent “expert” witness. So far we have had a car mechanic, a podcaster, a temp, and now a know huckster whose reputation goes back some time

2021-01-01 17:46:33 UTC  

So not examining them is proof there was no fraud?

2021-01-01 17:47:05 UTC  

Basically your oligarchic overlords have spoken any other dissent please keep it to yourself.

2021-01-01 17:47:21 UTC  

Thanks for playing @Massie1223

2021-01-01 17:48:38 UTC  

@Massie1223 what is there to examine. Do any of these Trump supporters even know what a forensic audit would entail. The last “forensic.” Audit was done by a car mechanic that lied about being a military intelligence officer.

2021-01-01 17:49:03 UTC  

They did two full hand counts. This takes the machines completely out of the equation

2021-01-01 17:49:54 UTC  

There is a ton of new evidence. We know.

2021-01-01 17:50:08 UTC  

Not exactly... At can determine if extra ballots were put into the pool... And it also can't determine if ballots marked by a machine were put into the pool... But never mind any of that.

2021-01-01 17:50:22 UTC  

If those things are actually possible.

2021-01-01 17:50:31 UTC  

Idk...

2021-01-01 17:51:00 UTC  

@busillis no it can’t , all these machines do is count the physical ballots.

2021-01-01 17:51:19 UTC  

Not true some can Mark ballots...

2021-01-01 17:51:32 UTC  

Doesn’t matter in a full hand recount

2021-01-01 17:52:08 UTC  

If there are questionable ballots they get eyes on them during the counting process

2021-01-01 17:52:13 UTC  

There you go playing voting expert.... If it's true that some machines can actually Mark ballots how did the hand recounters know whether they were marked by a machine or not?

2021-01-01 17:52:15 UTC  

The machine is now the human

2021-01-01 17:52:42 UTC  

Human interaction is typically worse than machine interaction.

2021-01-01 17:52:46 UTC  

Machines don’t mark ballots

2021-01-01 17:52:58 UTC  

They just count them

2021-01-01 17:53:09 UTC  

They don’t make coffee

2021-01-01 17:53:26 UTC  

They don’t do anything but count and tally

2021-01-01 17:53:41 UTC  

I will not keep it to myself.

2021-01-01 17:53:50 UTC  

If you don’t like the machine you just use the hand recount to verify against the machine

2021-01-01 17:54:02 UTC  

There is nothing to keep to yourself @Massie1223

2021-01-01 17:54:11 UTC  

It’s all manufactured garbage because Trump lost

2021-01-01 17:54:46 UTC  

Hard counts are not examinations of electronic interference

2021-01-01 17:55:22 UTC  

It takes the machine out of the equation @Massie1223

2021-01-01 17:55:57 UTC  

There is no electronic interface with physical hand counting

2021-01-01 17:56:18 UTC  

The machine is always part of the equation

2021-01-01 17:56:28 UTC  

Not if you don’t use them

2021-01-01 17:56:32 UTC  

Which is what they did

2021-01-01 17:56:36 UTC  

True

2021-01-01 17:56:51 UTC  

They did two full hand recounts

2021-01-01 17:57:02 UTC  

No machine involvement