Deploy a heat ray? You mean like a hair dryer? Is this the star wars universe?

Deploy military as police force ? This statement is virtually meaningless

Trump murdered someone now?

What planet do you live on? Tattooing?

He went after states that legalized pot. He blocked states from regulating college loan companies. He tried to shove nationwide conceal carry through. He fought governors that didn’t want offshore drilling in their state. They certainly have wanted to force states to run elections how Trump wants.

First off, the statements youre making have so little info and context, I have to assume they are completely made up. But you literally think hes a horrible person for taking part in politics ?

I get it maybe you have been in a coma for 4 years. Let me help you out there.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2020/12/19/trump-reportedly-asked-advisors-about-deploying-military-to-overturn-election/?sh=b046f36ce2b7

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-minneapolis-police-protest-troops/trump-wanted-to-deploy-10000-troops-in-washington-d-c-official-says-idUSKBN23E0DY

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/16/913748800/military-police-leaders-weighed-deploying-heat-ray-against-d-c-protesters

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/26/us/politics/trump-campaign-immigration.html

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4824386/lawyer-argues-president-trump-prosecuted-office-shoots

The military developed a heat ray weapon that makes those you point it at feel as if their skin is on fire. It was deemed too bad to use in military combat. Trump has suggested using it on both peaceful protestors and immigrants. No not a "hair dryer".

Bro this is all speculation

"Looked into"

"Wanted to"

"Considered"

No Trump did not murder someone or whatever strawman you want to use. His lawyer in court argued he should be able to as President shoot someone in cold blood and not have states prosecute him for the crime of murder. Yes deploying the military to stop protests and overturn elections is a big deal. Normal presidents don't do these things.

Every article.

This is not something sane people "consider" or ask the people in their administration how to physically do or argue in courts to try and get judicial rulings for.

My statement i pointed to a real life situation that actually happened

This is a waste of my time

Arguing without knowledge on a topic or facts to back up your claims generally is a waste of time. Hopefully you will be better informed now.

GOP Senators Murkowski and Toomey just came out and said they will vote to certify the election.

https://twitter.com/sentoomey/status/1345486488394485760?s=21

This makes it virtually impossible for the senate to reject electors because every GOP senator is needed in order to toss them

yeah I mean it wasnt really a thing anyways because the GOP electors dont follow any law which means even if they had the votes and were trolling a lawsuit would be won against them.

they cast the elector votes "procedurally" needing a won lawsuit proving fraud or other to validate the electors otherwise they are just blatantly violating laws with only one slate of electors present

Navarro said Pence can postpone inauguration LOL

He’s crazier than Lin Wood

I think they’ve lost it...and I’m saying that as a Trump supporter

they lost it a long time ago. glad you caught up.

I don’t agree with that

I am saying Navarro lost it today — because the 20th amendment mandates 20th January.

With most of the political lies, on blatant display... It’s almost as if we’re being tested or the worst is yet to come.

Here’s how 1/6 works for those who don’t know.

In yellow: the house parliamentarian (they advise the VP on what to say) pence will need one because this is his first time

In Red: the House tellers, *They* read the electoral votes after Pence hands it to them. This group is bipartisan with 2 Dems and 2 GOP reading them

Because of covid, they made last minute changes. They bought a 200 million contract with dominion to count it, they will also be getting rid of signature verification requirements since the votes will come in by absentee ballots, also just because they are there doesn't entitle them to meaningfully observe, and the adjudication process happens in the back.

The dems are cheaters. Judgement day is coming

It won’t come for them. No matter what comes out, Dems have enough votes in the House to override any objections raised by 1 senator and 1 house representative. Pence can’t do anything

Pretend the fraud is 100% certain and blatantly obvious to both parties. There is no legal compulsion to vote against a fraudulent result, they can do it anyway

They can vote to certify a fraudulent results — nothing will happen

I think the actual goal of January 6th for team Trump is to use it as a way to “expose” GOP senators and reps who vote down objections.

No doubt potus wants to primary a bunch of gop senators. January 6th is a useful event that helps him in that regard

not really. It will expose them politically and trump can help reshape the party in 2022 and 2024. Trump doesn't have a institutional support and it shows. He made terrible decisions in who to trust and hire which are coming back to haunt him.

Barr was responsible for so many cover ups for bush

Jan 6th will be a circus thTs for sure

I think at some point Mitch will get the senators to stop objecting if multiple objection votes fail

@gadi 😎, you just advanced to level 2!

POTUS isn’t looking to primary people, he wants to stay in power

trump has expressed in the past that he likes to get even. He will definitely be in a position to if he loses because of them

There’s nothing legitimately appealing to Biden. He has done nothing good in the 47 years he has been in politics. Dems don’t care, they just look at personality