I don't care if someone draws toddlers getting spitroasted by demons, they're not real kids, it's artistic expression, and freedom of speech ought to be unconditional

It's just not my thing

<:thvnk:332928260004642827>

No, they should still go to jail.

Problem was when character biggest trait is "it's a loli" imo

Like sure no reason a character can't be a loli but most just feel shoehorned like in AAA games you have gay characters

Not characters who are gay just gay characters

@johnfrum "stop liking what I don't like...or else!"

Commie John is back

The first amendment was for political thinking and activism not justification for obscenity.

then i will make it my political thinking that lolis a cute

<:angery:423058200661590017>

@sum https://store.steampowered.com/app/311690/Enter_the_Gungeon/

it's on sale now

no excuse

`Price $3750.00`

<:pepewot:327934404234313739>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESx_hy1n7HA

Also this is some weird code

@johnfrum what's "obscene" is 100% up to whoever's in power at the time and, as such, that definition is prone to abuse. Therefore fuck that. Free speech is free speech unless it infringes on the rights of others

Get bent, Commie shitsuck

yes, stop making america ungreat 😡

when will commiefornians learn??

@Matthew shut up

I know speech is impractical to limit for the reason you stated but at the same time I'm not going to pretend the intent was to give degenerates a pass and a voice.

libtards still assmad that trump-sama won

lmaoing tbh

Poor John. If it were up to him, people would only be able to masturbate to same-race heterosexual porn, and only during government mandated hours. It's a good thing he'll be stacking boxes till the day he dies instead of influencing public opinion 😊

Shouldnt you join fedora in his vow of silence

@Matthew if it were up to me I wouldnt change anything, you retard which I have stated over and over. Masturbation isnt a social issue worth getting into.

But what people masturbate TO is? <:thvnk:332928260004642827>

I don't like images of children getting abused and would very much like for the people who get off to it to be used as jamal's chew toy but on the scale of things worth devoting time and resources to they are low on the priority list.

But they aren't children. They're pictures.

No shit

Don't anthropomorphize jpegs, John.

If we were talking about those photorealistic 3D renders, that are almost indistinguishable from the real thing, I'd be with you 100%

But anime children?? Cmon

Intent matters and the people who get off to it are disgusting people who in a perfect world should be found and excluded from society. But practically there will never be the resources and if there was there will never be any group of people who are benevolent enough to be trusted to only do thier job.

What if you wank to loli once or twice

@Matthew Why draw the line at renders at that point? Child pornography is illegal because of the victimization, soon technology will make renders near indistinguishable from the real thing and then you will sound a lot like me regarding the issue.

>muh morality

No. Laws ought to be based on victimization or lack thereof.