Message from @itslennytime
Discord ID: 779574055769473024
I found a video on bitchute of a guy praying the rosary in latin, and it was very useful, however I looked deeper into their channel and he has another rosary prayer called the painful mysteries, and he also says, "seig heil" and makes pig noises mocking the hebrew language
wtf is this page bro
looks scuffed
Dont know, it was linked from the channel that I found the latin rosary video on
ha lol. might give it a read
I just wanna know if they're like heretics or something, Because I prayed the rosary along with him which isnt at all good
I mean I didnt know at the time, but still
dunno. would have to look into it more
uh. at the most it will only be a venial sin. if they are heretics
I think they might believe in like "aryan jesus" or something
based.
Wait isnt that wrong tho?
I dont know, hopefully Ill find out what they're all about one day tho
tru. wouldn't worry about it too much. just avoid it to be safe tho.
Ill go ahead an email them and ask them what they're about
hahahah
"Jesus was a nonwhite refugee"
he was hebrew but other than that he didnt immigrate to sweden or smthn
yeah. tell me later if they reply
Is novus ordo valid?
I was having a conversation with someone on the validity of the Ordinary form of the Roman Rite, and he states that there are a few things wrong with Novus Ordo that would make it invalid;
1. The priest and the people are on the same level on the novus order
2. It's profane. has no value or respect for what’s sacred
3. It took Christ from the center and put the priest and the assembly in their place
And I've also heard arguments that priests ordained under the new rite are invalid, can someone refute this claim?
Yes
How is it valid? Im trying to explain to someone that it is indeed a vaild mass
And all priests and clergy ordained underneath the new order are valid
The simple thing is that the ordination and liturgical rite is allowed to be changed to whatever the pope wants since it’s not set in stone
Validity isn’t about how he feels about it
He calls it profane, do you have any arguments that would refute that claim?
It’s his opinion. They still consecrate the sacrament and distribute it. There’s no disrespect in how it’s performed
He a sede?
Not sure, but if he is then that would answer why he takes into question the legitimacy of the Novus Ordo mass
He is not, he recognizes that pope francis is our pope
Would I be correct in saying that any statement on liturgy cannot be infallable, as it would have to be universal?
Therefore the Church reserves the right to change it?
(But obviously not reverse it)
If he recognises the papacy then he must submit to it
Liturgical rites can’t be set infallibly because it’s not a matter of faith and morals
Yeah they can change and reverse it because it’s a doctrine rather than a dogma
The only way you can do it invalidly is if you say the wrong words for the consecration or don’t have holy orders
And an infallable statement has to be universal
Anyways on a better note, our mass is going back inside this comming week, and I am excited to celebrate the mass indoors once again