Message from @🅱arD
Discord ID: 283438018747170819
@🅱arD are you talking about shoe? She's retarded and never makes a clear point or takes a stand on anything or even redpills people through humor. The bitch is whack.
I wouldn't say she's that bad.
The redpilling process generally goes:
"I'll see if the feminists want me in their community... oh."
"Well, this skeptic community seems fun and intersting... huh, these guys are massive faggots."
"What's this pol thing? Huh, fucking hell, this is fascinating. There's gotta be more."
And so on.
The Skeptic community is faggotry, but they train people to question certain things.
But yeah she generally doesn't produce any high quality content, or good arguements.
It certainly went for me that way.
i'd rather not everybody need to go to pol, that would never work
Pol is not perfect, pol shocks you and breaks down your pre conceived notions.
Breaking your conditioning per se.
So does /b/, but less coherently.
It's by no means the end, and anyone who thinks it is has problems but it is necessary for a lot of people.
Literally just sits her pretty face in front of a camera 2 times a month and rants about how horrible feminism is for 10 minutes.
But people like that kind of stuff apparently.
Is anyone here saying that if they weren't a pretty girl they wouldn't milk it for all it's worth like that?
I suppose it's /relatable/.
Isn't lactation possible only after birth?
IT CAN BE CAUSED BY HORMONAL STUFF!
There is a way.
HAHAHAHA
fucking a
There's always a fucking way
Sometimes I'll watch her stuff, but after the candid thing I don't really feel like it.
Candid just.. weird me out.
@🅱arD Yeah, %90 of pundits for any viewpoints are actually stupid and oversimplifications.
But she's a necessary blandness.
pretty sure some men can lactate
Candid?
Men can lactate, you need to have insane hormonal problems for it to happen though.
An attempt at an AI governed anonymous social network.
What?
That sounds fucken sick.
Yea.
That censors things SJW style based on tests
"White people kill themselves" is fine but "Black people kill themselves" gets hidden.
That just seems like a reverse of normal social media.
While promoting itself to be a "Free Speech" program.
I don't think I'd want that.
Also it can be exploited to trade CP or exploit children.
Holy shit, why?
It actually didn't claim to be free speech in a classical liberal/libertarian sense.
That sounds like someone looked at 4chan and went "You know, I'm just gonna take anything good or tolerable about this and just get rid of it, just all shit."