made for business it just depends what you need specwise

portability,ports,batterylife, etc

I was more interested in the quality of build / expected lifetime for a similarly spected lenovo vs HP pro/elite book

where as T440s are decent at all master of none of those, *books usualy tend to be more focused toward single need

Oh

So more "specialized" or something like that?

there used to be meme picture of RPG archetypes for HP *book series

but sadly i dont have it saved anywhere

(but next one comes from top of my head and is probly old data:)
elitebooks : business looks
lifebooks :media(old line??)
~~ultrabooks: portability~~
probook: processing power

and Zbooks: pure calculation power* ofc but those are rarely for even 500 unless beaten to shit

im not sure even if the ultrabooks are their proper separate line now or just added marketing tag on certain models (im no expert on them either)

but generaly said where as lenovos are more IT favored devices, HP ones are for accountting/sales staff

@Mereck ordered that for him

It's done

got him the T440S

it comes with a 1080p screen

and a SSD

128 gb

and some i5 processor that's a stepup from the lower end T440S series

and 8 gb ram which is more than good enough for a few tabs

next week "jignx this computer you got me is too heavy, too ugly, does not play mein-craft, also its reaally noisy, you dont know shit about computers .. i bought macbookair and see how good this is"

Next next week "local elderly man brutally murdered by autistic transwoman, fecal matter scrawlings blame "normies"

should he be leaf/fighting

since you know

a leek

@Jignx should be flying
Since you know
A bird

not all birds fly though

But farfetched does

Unless sirfetched loses his flight upon evolution?

@Billy Yum Yum Two-By-Two just ordered a new patch

That looks like shit bro

you look like shit

Bitch I'll fuck your mouth

it's a historical patch, not a custom design that's sole purpose is to look good

but why it looks like shit then 'historical' or not its bad quality one

or that picture is taken with reaaaly overkill camera so the mistakes show

probably the latter

if it tries to look like real deal it fails at that in quite many fronts

or if it tries to be edgy SAS copy https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/56/Uk-sas.svg

it still fails somewhat at it