I really didn’t need that

you just wanted to mess with me?

No

then yes, you DID need that

because you used a false assertion

"false assertion"

Lol, coming from the dude who hasn't been able to justify any of his positions because "philosophy is false"

i posted in context why and you still won't acknowledge it, stop instigating and ignoring proof

Only the Bibilical context, as in preceding verses, experts tend to disagree, though this may be pulling the appeal to authority, it's better left that way because I'm a layman

And the Bible saying it's false doesn't make it so...

😹

*Laughs in Jewish*

you asked for biblical proof and now you flat out deny the proof after all that time?

!mute @Friedrich i've had enough of your instigating

Who tf in their right mind gave this guy mod??

@Wendigo bibleman and dew surpassed me

Even though I was here longer than them

So I have no idea

bork, stop concern trolling

Or what?

You'll be sent to the ice box

And be where the other guy went

😂

I mean you asked

I’ve been in his server

or what? seriously? you basically admitted to it

I’m used to it

So I gave the the answer

Rhetorical question

I mean this is the Internet

Idk how I was supposed to know but that's cool

I was asking him

All Gucci gang

Problems still to be solved:

>Showing that humans are inherently evil, to be shown that you can get a normative claim (moral - good & bad) from an empirical claim. So as to make a general method of agreement for every belief system.

WellI could give you a semi example

If you put a bunch of people in the bush, first they are going to be killing each other, then slowly they will learn that grouping up is more efficient for survival, beginning a foundation for morality

Devine morality, there is an actual right way to do things, that is genuinely more benificial

Divine morality is a different topic altogether.

The question is simple, show objective moral duties exist through empirical claims.

What impirical claims are you implying?