<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Ain't-that-a-kick has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

god is fake

evolution is real

change my mind

God is real and evolution is real

If you do not believe in science then you do not believe in God

If you believe in science then you believe in God

That's not evidence

But humans are special, no?

Humans are made of matter

Matter is energy

Humans evolved

The beginning of time

How long did it take?

Oh right, no time

The only answer that is left is God

I dont think theres solid lav scientific evidence for god but actual historical data combined with data supports it strongly

Also i still need to watch tge video

So whats wrong w/ Big Bang

neither

god isn't real

evolution is fake

@Triscuit !move <#538929818834698260>

Move in progress

o yes @Pythomancer

Fridays the day im actually gonna watch the video. Atleast 1 out of 2 hours. Sorry, my teachers are not being nice and are spamming me with projects at the end of the year

@the21cat -- how'reyou coming along, on that video! lmfao at u <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594> ...
--u aint watched it yet , you mo'fo lol SMHhhhh...........

I dont want to use data to load it and something came up so i will have to put it iff until a mix of some very late tonight and some early morning tomorrow

@the21cat - you're on a 'limited Data' plan or data cap? ...
.

Data cap i think? I have limited data then it runs out for the month

I would for a short video but its like 2 hours long

***(not the first time ive thought of this either, but..) yeah.. sighs .. ---this must be why a lot of people are "still what they are" ..becasue ..they dont WATCH//LISTEN (load//play ) to the "VIDS" we all show them : /

such as great Flat Earth stuff, and ...stuff like this here too with Creation and stuffs

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧ i agreed to watch it its just 2 hours long and my teachers bully me with projects

Im 6 minutes in. So far I agree

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/09/lucy-facts-on-early-human-ancestor/ awe man, I still have this issue of nat geographic lying around somewhere

9:40 sudden change "sudden change. overnight, homos appear." Not really what we are saying kinda close to the opposite of what we want to say

I was in middle school when I read about it

oh he was overexaggerating alot apparently

I agree with what he is saying and we kinda our being manipulated in the sense that just because we find a primape fossil doesn't mean it gave rise to us. That is a common misconception they do advertise. Its not fake though as he says. Fossils are legitament. But most of them are most plausibly not in a monophyletic group from a recent ancestor scientifically speaking. And this is a common scientific misconception supported by companies and stuff saying like "our ancestor" when really we don't have the link but a paraphyletic species that is primeape but most likely branched off completely before. Unless they can get DNA or cytochrome C data which I highly would doubt then yeah they aren't really closely related: we just can't confirm it. Unless we had thousands of diversified primeape fossils homologous structure wouldn't work accurately

the other arguement that would be recieved by this is people who support puncutated equillibrium which means evolution happens very rapidly (most support a mix of both). Most likely not likely in a k selective species (basically big mammal type creature) because we have few offspring, live long, time before reproductive age is long, generally makes it impossible for a species to evolve fast. Though k pod orcas are in debate actually for a new species so I don't know