¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I did as well in the form of an entire room of evidence

Also, I made a mistake earlier, I said they were effective in 99% of cases, but meant they cause little/no harm in 99% of cases

I'm not gonna lie and say that most of them have anywhere near a 99% effectiveness, but they are markedly more effective than electing not to take vaccinations

https://www.scribd.com/doc/220807175/157-Research-Papers-Supporting-the-Vaccine-Autism-Link?fbclid=IwAR0qoz2mSBld-uf_kAonv5wd0pCVwXrpvuS2wfNu-mLB2I8gzFvHmwzEJ48#scribd

Checkmate

This was also in that room.

I was avoiding posting it, here, because it's horrendously disgusting that you guys come here without research.

And hoped you would come across it in your researching and looking through our channels.

https://www.nhs.uk/news/medication/no-link-between-mmr-and-autism-major-study-finds/

???

https://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/committee/topics/mmr/mmr_autism/en/

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html

https://www.scribd.com/doc/220807175/157-Research-Papers-Supporting-the-Vaccine-Autism-Link?fbclid=IwAR0qoz2mSBld-uf_kAonv5wd0pCVwXrpvuS2wfNu-mLB2I8gzFvHmwzEJ48#scribd

You think 3 biased papers holds more water than just this compilation of 157?

Not to mention all of the other links in that room?

It would appear you will never look at any of our evidence so I'm not sure you deserve to be here, anymore.
What say you, in your defense?
@「阿波根うみこ」

omg how does vaccines cause autism

@TheWorldController

says it on the vaccine insert its self

`You think 3 biased papers holds more water than just this compilation of 157?` No, your sources have just as much bias as anyone else. Also, there is a greater number of studies which have COMPLETELY disproved the idea that vaccines cause autism. Look at *Graphical Science* studies.
`Not to mention all of the other links in that room?
It would appear you will never look at any of our evidence so I'm not sure you deserve to be here, anymore.` Uh, I don't think you looked through all of the other evidence for a disagreeing opinion. Sounds like you're trying to shut down someone who disagrees with you.
`What say you, in your defense?` sorry mate, this isn't a trial

No, post-approval use is after the vaccine has been approved for general use in the public. Regardless, these are effects that are merely noted after having received the vaccine, but the vaccine may not be the cause

@road to diabetes @Magical Sheep Then you didn't look at anything in that room and have no room, nor the knowledge to contest the information.

@「阿波根うみこ」 Pretty sure I asked you a question.

That is a big oof

I read through <#551617059013001236> at your request a couple of days prior @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

I'm a mod, I can make this a trial, should I feel as though you deliberately ignore the evidence.

Also, I doubt it or that would make you insanely intellectually dishonest.

You read through all 157 papers linking a very real risk of autism to vaccines?

And still deny it?

Read the insert? The ones that clearly mention **AUTISM** as a potential adverse effect?

And still deny it?

You didn't read shit.

Read the bit about measles vaccine spreading measles? Or all of the people who got what they were vaccinated against?

And still deny it?

So it's perfectly fair for you to ban someone from this Discord because you disagree with them on one topic?

Power tripping much?

Lmao causation is not correlation

That must be what I said. Thank you for paying attention.

@Magical Sheep Shifting the goal post

In addition, i notice that none of this anti-vaccine fervor existed until after an erroneous study that was retracted and the researcher stripped of their medical license