Message from @「阿波根うみこ」
Discord ID: 576174175350423573
You clearly admitted to reading headlines.
How do you know I've not read these sort of articles before and yet still come to the conclusion that vaccines do vastly more good
You couldn't have gone through all that material so quickly.
Because that would be insanely intellectually dishonest.
What would, deciding that vaccines do vastly more good than any harm?
So you're allowed to go against the scientific consensus on vaccines, potentially harming thousands of people, yet *I'm* an issue?
See, the very fact that you think I'm harming, or potentially harming, anyone clearly shows that you have not read anything I referred you to.
And yes, deciding they cause more good, **AFTER,** reading the material in that room would be insanely intellectually dishonest of anyone.
Jesus Christ, have you never heard of herd immunity? And once again, the only reason you even see these sort of articles is *precisely because vaccines are so effective in 99% of cases*
Prove it
Cite your sources
It is highly unlikely to have negative side effects from vaccines
Prove it
Cite your sources
***"Jesus Christ, have you never heard of herd immunity? And once again, the only reason you even see these sort of articles is precisely because vaccines are so effective in 99% of cases"***
Sources for this particular claim.
I'll wait.
Immunity? Yes, I have immunities from **NOT BEING VACCINATED!!!**
***NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND!!!***
<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @「阿波根うみこ」 has been warned
```
reason: Duplicated text
```
Oh really
<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @「阿波根うみこ」 has been warned
```
reason: Duplicated text
```
...
Until you read the articles in <#551617059013001236>
I will not read yous
Yours
I'd say that's fair
...
I'm sorry, you only read headlines, and you still expect me to read your sources?
Explain the logic
You asked me for sources
I provided sources
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I did as well in the form of an entire room of evidence
Also, I made a mistake earlier, I said they were effective in 99% of cases, but meant they cause little/no harm in 99% of cases
I'm not gonna lie and say that most of them have anywhere near a 99% effectiveness, but they are markedly more effective than electing not to take vaccinations
Checkmate
This was also in that room.