Figure it out

Im not your monkey

^ lmao

that's an ad hominem argument, trying to call someone a sheep or a conformist

Sheep follow the flock to the bitter end which is why I assume mainstream-ers are referred to as sheep. @Magical Sheep <@434150361586991104>

So a "normal person" does equal a sheep.

normal people don't hate the world, aren't bitter toward any authority

There aren't many people like that.

people who believe that vaccines cause harm are bitter toward authority

There are people like that though.

It isn't about being bitter either, Magical. It's distrust due to the authority lying even once or twice or multiple times just to keep the story-line in one way. @Magical Sheep

Vaccines are ok guys , ok

as long as they don't contain anything suspicious

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-06-06-public-health-officials-admit-mmr-vaccine-causes-measles.html

http://humansarefree.com/2019/06/samoa-withdraws-mmr-vaccine-after-two.html

seems the MMR is killing and spreading disease

looks like you guys need to get your facts straight and stop buying into all the BS in the MAINSTREAM MEDIA

Please vaccinate your children

It dost cause autism you just some dumb mf

They will die at the age of three

@everyone

I would heck a antivax because I would rather just pay 3 years worth of child support

Yeah ill need an autopsy report before that can be validated as true

you anti-vaxxers please give me one reason why i shouldn't vaccinate my kids

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-03-06-genetic-sequencing-science-breakthrough-just-proved-that-measles-outbreaks-are-caused-by-the-measles-vaccine.html

https://www.scribd.com/doc/220807175/157-Research-Papers-Supporting-the-Vaccine-Autism-Link?fbclid=IwAR0qoz2mSBld-uf_kAonv5wd0pCVwXrpvuS2wfNu-mLB2I8gzFvHmwzEJ48#scribd

https://www.scribd.com/document/256294651/Vaccinated-people-can-infect-the-Immune-Compromised

https://www.scribd.com/document/83004210/CDC-MMR-MMR-V-MMRV-Seizure-Rates

http://humansarefree.com/2017/04/author-and-activist-explains-link.html

A quote from the father of scientific population control, Thomas Malthusian, serves as a reminder of the true intentions of some scientists and social engineering programs:

“Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague.

“In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations.*12 But above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases; and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders.
“If by these and similar means the annual mortality were increased from 1 in 36 or 40, to 1 in 18 or 20, we might probably every one of us marry at the age of puberty, and yet few be absolutely starved.” ~ Thomas Malthus, An Essay on the Principle of Population, 1826

SOUNDS FAMILIAR

If you like authority, you're a happy and willing slave.

Im going through the 157 papers right now and i already see a problem in the first one. The whole point of a 95% confidentiality range is to see if the difference in 2 sets of data are due ti chance. If the ranges overlap there is no significant statistical difference between the two. When you say there is a connection between the 2 and you give ranges overlapping thats just not understanding how to use 95% confidentiality. In other words the experiment supports no connection between the 2.

I realize this is going to take a long time but im going to go through them all anyways until i find one that works

2. Nothing wrong with this paper more of a user error though

They come to the conclusion based off of an anonymous survey that vaccinated kids are more likely to have certain neurological diseases. HOWEVER that is a big user error to assume that they were caused by thr vaccines because there is one thing being forgotten: the sample size could very well be biased to one side. If people who are more likely to get a vaccine but because they have these diseases already then people with autism could be more likely to get vaccinated. Unfortunately we cant make that claim either because the reverse could be true.

So in other words the paper says nothing

3 is the exact same problem

4 same problem as 1. I thought it would be a good study especially because thats what health institute's tell pregnant women to avoid but they found the opposite result and supported the opposite claim they should have. I dont understand why its difficult. This is literally the first thing we learned in my class and the ap biology test uses this overlapping range to try to screw people up especially with bar graphs but people are just being dumb and not looking at there data. Also its a different topic anyways

5 support the experiment but not directly connected to vaccines. Also to any antivaxxers this paper is directing you to use mercury arguements not aluminium. Actually aluminium causing autism is basically destroyed. If youre interested in what to look for check 5. Of course this means youll have to check if mercury accumulation prevents mercury detoxification but it has the most potential so far. Still not proven or definite evidence just a leading direction