an experiment is the expression of a hypothesis.

you dont perform an experiment then claim the experiment is your observed phenomena

do u guys know how science works ?

Enlighten us, your eminence

you should look into it

Thats a pretty cool experiment but i dont have dense lead balls or the mechanical invention arm thing to use. Actually apparently torsion balances are a lot simpler then i thought they were. If i can get something to hold like 300 objects up i might be able to do it at home. I guess the main problem would be friction though between the arm and the pivot

Have you guys seen the flat Earth documentary on Netflix

Have you guys seen how much fakery is on tv

>>ban 290354003366379520 gross troll

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully banned <@290354003366379520>

so what do you think guys about the earth being flat or a globe

yes

<@582196557592657931> please tell me what Cavendish did

Cavendish discovered RF harvesting and static fields

Possibly dowsing

next time a brainwashed globe believer asks why a mic drops when u let it go tell them its because u picked it up

if u dont pick stuff up it doesnt fall that is why it falls becuase u picked it up

cavendish said the force is 50 million to 1 ?

they dont know the cause of gravity

george musser recently said gravity isnt even a force

cavendish experiment isnt even a real science experiment

holy shit where to even start picking apart this nonsense

Yes. Nonsense

gravitational time dilation is truly an amazing phenomenon. this is when the time between two events are elapsed based on the gravitational potential of the two clocks. two experiments have really stood out to me: the Hafele–Keating experiment and the Pound–Rebka experiment. in the first experiment, there were four cesium beam atomic clocks. some were placed onto commercial planes while others stayed at a laboratory. when they were later compared, the time was in fact elapsed, and proved that the predictions from the general and special relativity were accurate. the second experiment was also related in some way to gravitational time dilation. the general theory of relativity predicted that a photon emitted downwards will experience a higher change in frequency (blueshift). the experiment was a very successful precision test for the general theory of relativity. also related to gravitational redshift, in which the frequency of a light source is changed based on its position from a gravitational source.

and no, I did not copy and paste that.

You one sick boi

interesting

Yeah bunk experiments

In Albert Einstien's theory it says that the universe is a shape of a room, otherwise would everything be flat. But I have a theory about our galaxy that our galaxy is in the same room as the universe.

That means the earth must be round and it we are in the same room as universe.

😃

lol gravity isnt a force i went over this like 5 times. Theres a difference in the force of gravity and gravity itself but people can't seem to get ahold of it. Since no one explained the cavendish experiment I will. Please don't say stuff till the end of my explanation.

So lets begin with what should happen when everything goes right. you have a rotating frictionless arm with 2 100 kg dense masses on each end and 2 non moving, heavier (to reduce friction on arm because the force of friction increases from more weight) masses 180 degrees apart just so that the rotating arm will barely not touch the masses. The rotating arm is set a little bit away from the masses like 20 degrees, then you let go; in like an hour I would assume it will have rotated a small amount toward the masses and gain kinetic energy because it moving. (Reminder this is in a perfect system where everything is being assumed right right now)...

If it were to rotate it would gain kinetic energy (speed for practical terms in this case) and would either need to have gained energy or have had energy switched from another from another form. If we define our system as the weights and the arm then it shouldn't have gained energy and thus transformed from something which we will call the potential energy of gravity. Its the most reasonable assumption we can make. It is the only isolated variable. (This is still assuming everything said is perfect now)

ok

Well from pendulums we know that potential energy of gravity (or potential energy from being upwards, energy from being lifted, whatever you want to call it, etc) is switched to between kinetic energy and that potential energy (again please keep all comment for the end).

So if all mentioned above is true, the masses will oscillate (as in like the pendulum moving back and forward) continuously. Using measurements from its oscillation would allow people to conclude a mass attracts mass because there would be nothing else to input the energy, and b something im about to find because i forgot to research tha part🤔

oh i missed something

He also had a wire that hung the arm which he could use to see how much torque and therefor force was put on the masses

Since he could actually measure the force of the "attraction" (again bare with me), he could accurately measure Force, mass, time, and distance, which allowed him to plug these things into an equation "Fg" (the force of attraction he measured with the wire) = m1m2"G" (a constant that worked to make one side equal the other)/r (distance)^2