Message from @Human Sheeple
Discord ID: 595680830056300574
also, the two lasers deviating a little was the expected result and the actual resukt
gravitational waves are real
stop lying
No it confirmed the earth isnt moving
Lying?
F off
>>mute @MASTER CHEF
<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully muted **MASTER CHEF**#9909
Ah, I see a Robert Sungenis (The Principle) bit of propaganda. That quote from Michelson has been butchered, which is a not-uncommon Sungenis tactic. This is the full quote from Albert Michelson:
```This conclusion directly contradicts the explanation of the phenomenon of aberration which has been hitherto generally accepted, and which presupposes that the earth moves through the ether, the latter remaining at rest.```
The Michelson-Morely experiment was designed to test drag through the Luminiferous Ether. The actual conclusion reached was that no such drag was detected. This concludes two things based on two different presumptions: 1) on a rotating earth, aether doesn't exist or 2) the earth is stationary and as such, no drag would be detected. For either conclusion to be reached, one would have to assume either a rotating or a stationary frame of reference.
@Citizen Z if you preform the Michelson moorely experiment on a train car moving, you will still get null results if you're on the cart.
It shows the Galeian view of relativity is insufficient to describe light's motion
I am doing the Michelson Moorely experiment in my optics class in a year I will get back to you with pictures if you want
I think its my optics class
If not I can probably just borrow the apparatus lol
That's pretty cool, Fran! I'd like to see the pics too, if they let you post 'em here.
👍
The earth caused Chernobyl nuff said
Like i said. Its inconclusive
```Actual results say the earth is at rest```
Those were not the results. The actual results say that the speed of light does not appear to change relative to the Earth’s motion. Any conclusions drawn from this presupposes a reference frame.
What's going on with these aether denying pseudoscientists brainwashed into the world of materialism
There are 2 true problems with flat earth
We have 2 celestial poles
And when you're in the south pole there are places when the sun never sets
the 2 celestial poles is my favorite proof
If you're on the perimeter of earth the sun should Always
it's devastating to flat earth
That said earth is a ball
Turned in
As you said the proofs above disprove north pole azimuth
They do have lots of valid proof earth is better than they say
Flat earthers do
You have two spinny light shows in the sky whoopdie fucking do, how does that prove my flat floor isn't flat?
NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN STAR TRAILS NICE FLAT WALKWAY: https://imgur.com/A3jmBPX
Flatness is all due to perspective
Contrary to that Steven character who claims to be the reincarnation of a diety
Earth curves up after the perceptual split
You need a *cylinder* to simulate it, though.
hence, the rotation of a globular earth.
Simulate it? Cylinder? What do you mean
sorry, replying to sheeple