```Actual results say the earth is at rest```
Those were not the results. The actual results say that the speed of light does not appear to change relative to the Earth’s motion. Any conclusions drawn from this presupposes a reference frame.

What's going on with these aether denying pseudoscientists brainwashed into the world of materialism

There are 2 true problems with flat earth

We have 2 celestial poles

And when you're in the south pole there are places when the sun never sets

the 2 celestial poles is my favorite proof

If you're on the perimeter of earth the sun should Always

it's devastating to flat earth

That said earth is a ball

Turned in

As you said the proofs above disprove north pole azimuth

They do have lots of valid proof earth is better than they say

Flat earthers do

You have two spinny light shows in the sky whoopdie fucking do, how does that prove my flat floor isn't flat?

NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN STAR TRAILS NICE FLAT WALKWAY: https://imgur.com/A3jmBPX

Flatness is all due to perspective

Contrary to that Steven character who claims to be the reincarnation of a diety

Earth curves up after the perceptual split

You need a *cylinder* to simulate it, though.

hence, the rotation of a globular earth.

Simulate it? Cylinder? What do you mean

sorry, replying to sheeple

Nasa has yet to present valid evidence earth spins

Well it's proof there's more than one solution to the problem

Until we can scientifically validate stars.....

All we can do is interferometry on starlight

This isn't really a solution, though. This is something that, visually, is vaguely similar to the bi-rotation of the stars in that it demonstrates why looking north or south changes the direction of rotation. The actual movement is the real problem. The stars themselves could be pixies for all that it matters - their movement simply doesn't make sense on a flat earth when both the celestial poles are visible from the same plane. Sure, you could speculate whatever made-up reasoning for it, but on a globe earth, *the movement makes perfect sense*. On a globe earth, the sky can ONLY rotate the way that it does. I don't have to come up with what-ifs. It just works. It's exceptional evidence the earth is a globe.

For example, the north celestial pole rises higher in the sky the farther north you travel and vice versa for the south celestial pole. This wouldn't be the case if the sky were a rotating cylinder around a flat earth- the poles would remain at the horizon at all times.

Yet they are both visible at the same time from the same place on a globe?

What, both celestial poles? Not unless you're at the equator.

actually, at the equator, you wouldn't see either pole. They would be *almost* visible. Like this pic:
http://sguisard.astrosurf.com/Pagim/SGU-From-pole-to-pole-PE-half-1200-cp9.jpg

So, only ever one pole at a time on a globe.

If the earth is flat, why doesn't anyone say that mars is flat

Curious

because mars is a luminary

Mars rover stuff is fake and gay.

Please elaborate on what luminary is, starting to get confused, is it a hologram?