The Michelson Morely experiment concluded that aether doesn't exist.

Wrong

how so?

It wasnt conclusive

Actual results say the earth is at rest

Other experiments confirm an ether

Michaelson morely experiment wasn't conclusive cuz it tried to prove ether and failed

also, the two lasers deviating a little was the expected result and the actual resukt

gravitational waves are real

stop lying

No it confirmed the earth isnt moving

Lying?

F off

>>mute @MASTER CHEF

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully muted **MASTER CHEF**#9909

Ah, I see a Robert Sungenis (The Principle) bit of propaganda. That quote from Michelson has been butchered, which is a not-uncommon Sungenis tactic. This is the full quote from Albert Michelson:
```This conclusion directly contradicts the explanation of the phenomenon of aberration which has been hitherto generally accepted, and which presupposes that the earth moves through the ether, the latter remaining at rest.```

The Michelson-Morely experiment was designed to test drag through the Luminiferous Ether. The actual conclusion reached was that no such drag was detected. This concludes two things based on two different presumptions: 1) on a rotating earth, aether doesn't exist or 2) the earth is stationary and as such, no drag would be detected. For either conclusion to be reached, one would have to assume either a rotating or a stationary frame of reference.

@Citizen Z if you preform the Michelson moorely experiment on a train car moving, you will still get null results if you're on the cart.

It shows the Galeian view of relativity is insufficient to describe light's motion

I am doing the Michelson Moorely experiment in my optics class in a year I will get back to you with pictures if you want

I think its my optics class

If not I can probably just borrow the apparatus lol

That's pretty cool, Fran! I'd like to see the pics too, if they let you post 'em here.

👍

The earth caused Chernobyl nuff said

Like i said. Its inconclusive

```Actual results say the earth is at rest```
Those were not the results. The actual results say that the speed of light does not appear to change relative to the Earth’s motion. Any conclusions drawn from this presupposes a reference frame.

What's going on with these aether denying pseudoscientists brainwashed into the world of materialism

There are 2 true problems with flat earth

We have 2 celestial poles

And when you're in the south pole there are places when the sun never sets

the 2 celestial poles is my favorite proof

If you're on the perimeter of earth the sun should Always

it's devastating to flat earth

That said earth is a ball

Turned in

As you said the proofs above disprove north pole azimuth

They do have lots of valid proof earth is better than they say