EXPLAIN IT @Dragon the Redcoat

Who wants to bet he is just coping some blog

DINOSAURS DIED TO GLOBAL WARMING EXPLAIN THAT @Dragon the Redcoat

Why do you not read?

Wh ydi you not actually typr

And instead use copypasta

The last ice age melted and humans weren’t doing anything then

LOL

http://gregoirecanlorbe.com/interview-with-istvan-marko-for-breitbart-news-network

@Dragon the Redcoat i will be more cautious. But global warming a hoax

Being more careful with our carbon footprint is bad for the economy

<:cool:507986727953235970>

Dragon the redcoat is killing the planet😡

I gyess free speach doesbt matter wheb it is against him!

Lol

@Toshi What is wrong with taxing negative externalities?

You idiots

Lmao

The feeling is mutual, Dragon.

"How dare you type, you must be an idiot!"

He wants there to be too much oxygen so the plants die 😡

No such thing

Alright, let us approach this objectively

CO2 is not – and has never been a poison
Each of our exhalations, each of our breaths, emits an astronomical quantity of CO2 proportionate to that in the atmosphere (some >40,000 ppm); and it is very clear that the air we expire does not kill anyone standing in front of us. What must be understood, besides, is that CO2 is the elementary food of plants. Without CO2 there would be no plants, and without plants there would be no oxygen and therefore no humans.

Plants love CO2. That’s why the planet is greening
Plants need CO2, water, and daylight. These are the mechanisms of photosynthesis, to generate the sugars that will provide them with staple food and building blocks. That fundamental fact of botany is one of the primary reasons why anyone who is sincerely committed to the preservation of the “natural world” should abstain from demonizing CO2. Over the last 30 years, there has been a gradual increase in the CO2 level. But what is also observed is that despite deforestation, the planet’s vegetation has grown by about 20 percent. This expansion of vegetation on the planet, nature lovers largely owe it to the increase in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere.

Oh no he's going through the whole thing again

There have been periods where the CO2 concentration was many times higher than now. Life thrived.
During the Jurassic, Triassic, and so on, the CO2 level rose to values sometimes ​​of the order of 7000, 8000, 9000 ppm, which considerably exceeds the paltry 400 ppm that we have today. Not only did life exist in those far-off times when CO2 was so present in large concentration in the atmosphere, but plants such as ferns commonly attained heights of 25 meters. Reciprocally, far from benefiting the current vegetation, the reduction of the presence of CO2 in the atmosphere would be likely to compromise the health, and even the survival, of numerous plants. To fall below the threshold of 280 or 240 ppm would plainly lead to the extinction of a large variety of our vegetal species.

Look what you've done

@AstralSentient Everything! Government already receives enough taxpayers money...maybe they should start taxing themselves first like members of parliament!

Provide the evidence for global warming and the co2 emissions causing this.
Where are the thermometers on every square mile of lands detecting these minute changes in average temp? Data?

Animals need CO2 too. And by the way – forests are not the ‘lungs of the earth’…
In addition, our relentless crusade to reduce CO2 could be more harmful to nature as plants are not the only organisms to base their nutrition on CO2. Phytoplankton species also feed on CO2, using carbon from CO2 as a building unit and releasing oxygen. By the way, it is worth remembering that ~70 percent of the oxygen present today in the atmosphere comes from phytoplankton, not trees. Contrary to common belief, it is not the forests, but the oceans, that constitute the “lungs” of the earth.

It is not true that CO2 has a major greenhouse effect. Reports of its influence have been exaggerated
It is worth remembering here too that CO2 is a minor gas. Today it represents only 0.04 percent of the composition of the air; and its greenhouse effect is attributed the value of 1. The major greenhouse gas in the atmosphere is water vapor which is ten times more potent than CO2 in its greenhouse effect. Water vapor is present in a proportion of 2 percent in the atmosphere. Those facts are, in principle, taught at school and at university, but one still manages to incriminate CO2 alongside this learning, in using a dirty trick that presents the warming effect of CO2 as minor but exacerbated, through feedback loops, by the other greenhouse effects.

But wait I thought the dinosaurs didn't exist

@Dragon the Redcoat global warming has been around for billions of years

Read

Climate change is natural
Over the last 12,000 years, what we have witnessed is an oscillation between warm and cold periods, thus periods with rising and declining sea levels. Incontestably, sea and ocean levels have been on the rise since the end of the Little Ice Age that took place approximately from the beginning of the 14th century until the end of the 19th century. At the end of that period, global temperatures started to rise. That being said, the recorded rise is 0.8 degrees Celsius and is, therefore, nothing extraordinary. If the temperature goes up, ocean water obviously dilates and some glaciers recede. This is something glaciers have always done, and not a specificity of our time.

Facts!!

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @................................ has been warned
```
reason: Duplicated text
```

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @................................ has been warned
```
reason: Duplicated text
```

Citizen posting FACTS

@Toshi Taxing negative externalities actually provides benefits to society, by discouraging, while the money can be used for public goods.