It isnt even global warming any more

It isnt called that

@AstralSentient I am a general person.......I do what I can.....we already recycle stuff and our govt banned plastic bags (now we use a recycled bags which are 💩 but it's a different story ). But I'm not paying any "carbon taxes" or any "green taxes". They can go screw themselves!

@Dragon the Redcoat THERE WAS GLOBAL WARMING BILLIONS OF YEARS AGO. 😡

As a scientist, I naturally hope that I can manage to confine myself into the field of what Vilfredo Pareto used to call the logico-experimental method, and that I do not let myself be skewed, without my knowledge, by feelings interfering with the seriousness of my theories and the validity of my experimentations. But my feelings are very certainly at stake when I examine the militant’s speech about the thesis of anthropogenic warming and the strange influence it exerts on governments and public opinion.

You know that right

It us currentky called climate change. Why dont you do your research

As a scientist, I naturally hope that I can manage to confine myself into the field of what Vilfredo Pareto used to call the logico-experimental method, and that I do not let myself be skewed, without my knowledge, by feelings interfering with the seriousness of my theories and the validity of my experimentations. But my feelings are very certainly at stake when I examine the militant’s speech about the thesis of anthropogenic warming and the strange influence it exerts on governments and public opinion.

Humans aren’t affecting he temperature of earth that much

I can still breathe so there is no problem

GLOBAL WARMING BILLIONS OF YEARS AGO EXPLAIN THAT @Dragon the Redcoat 😡

To begin, I believe in science: I mean that I believe in the possibility of objectively knowing reality through science. I believe that there are truth and falsehood, that science allows us to distinguish between the two, and that truth must be known; that scientific knowledge must be placed in the hands of the population. I also believe in freedom. I believe that every man is entitled to lead his life and to manage his goods as he sees fit, that he is the only possessor of himself, and that statist socio-economic control is as morally reprehensible as it is harmful in its social, economic, and environmental consequences.

To begin, I believe in science: I mean that I believe in the possibility of objectively knowing reality through science. I believe that there are truth and falsehood, that science allows us to distinguish between the two, and that truth must be known; that scientific knowledge must be placed in the hands of the population. I also believe in freedom. I believe that every man is entitled to lead his life and to manage his goods as he sees fit, that he is the only possessor of himself, and that statist socio-economic control is as morally reprehensible as it is harmful in its social, economic, and environmental consequences.

EXPLAIN IT @Dragon the Redcoat

Who wants to bet he is just coping some blog

DINOSAURS DIED TO GLOBAL WARMING EXPLAIN THAT @Dragon the Redcoat

Why do you not read?

Wh ydi you not actually typr

And instead use copypasta

The last ice age melted and humans weren’t doing anything then

LOL

http://gregoirecanlorbe.com/interview-with-istvan-marko-for-breitbart-news-network

@Dragon the Redcoat i will be more cautious. But global warming a hoax

Being more careful with our carbon footprint is bad for the economy

<:cool:507986727953235970>

Dragon the redcoat is killing the planet😡

I gyess free speach doesbt matter wheb it is against him!

Lol

@Toshi What is wrong with taxing negative externalities?

You idiots

Lmao

The feeling is mutual, Dragon.

"How dare you type, you must be an idiot!"

He wants there to be too much oxygen so the plants die 😡

No such thing

Alright, let us approach this objectively

CO2 is not – and has never been a poison
Each of our exhalations, each of our breaths, emits an astronomical quantity of CO2 proportionate to that in the atmosphere (some >40,000 ppm); and it is very clear that the air we expire does not kill anyone standing in front of us. What must be understood, besides, is that CO2 is the elementary food of plants. Without CO2 there would be no plants, and without plants there would be no oxygen and therefore no humans.

Plants love CO2. That’s why the planet is greening
Plants need CO2, water, and daylight. These are the mechanisms of photosynthesis, to generate the sugars that will provide them with staple food and building blocks. That fundamental fact of botany is one of the primary reasons why anyone who is sincerely committed to the preservation of the “natural world” should abstain from demonizing CO2. Over the last 30 years, there has been a gradual increase in the CO2 level. But what is also observed is that despite deforestation, the planet’s vegetation has grown by about 20 percent. This expansion of vegetation on the planet, nature lovers largely owe it to the increase in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere.

Oh no he's going through the whole thing again

There have been periods where the CO2 concentration was many times higher than now. Life thrived.
During the Jurassic, Triassic, and so on, the CO2 level rose to values sometimes ​​of the order of 7000, 8000, 9000 ppm, which considerably exceeds the paltry 400 ppm that we have today. Not only did life exist in those far-off times when CO2 was so present in large concentration in the atmosphere, but plants such as ferns commonly attained heights of 25 meters. Reciprocally, far from benefiting the current vegetation, the reduction of the presence of CO2 in the atmosphere would be likely to compromise the health, and even the survival, of numerous plants. To fall below the threshold of 280 or 240 ppm would plainly lead to the extinction of a large variety of our vegetal species.

Look what you've done