@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 It is actually good explained

You can't ecplain why a torus field only creates a sphere on the globe model and never anytime else in history or by testable replication. @Zerato

No, it's not.

Nit at all

Not in the slightest

Not ever

Correct phil

i just heard they cant solve a 3 body problem in space

That as well ^^^^

If gravity affects all mass the earth couldnt be flat. It would bend in on its self

hyman sheeple join back

Gravity is a theory and mass does not attract mass

key word is if

Yes they do

I gave you the set up for the experiment you can do at home

what experiment

human sheeple can u join lounge

to test what

You can explain it with the basic electromagnetic theory, with the equation of Maxwell Ampere, the spherical model create exactly the magnetic field observated

Why do you need Sheeple. what is your question

we need info

What info

Heavy mass ball and the balanced meter stick

we need to question him bout ai

how do u explain satellites when we cant solve a 3 body problem

AI is the evil That could bring down all mankind

It must be highly regulated so it does not become fully self-aware

The tangential velocity makes the downward acceleration zero

u see person of interest assassin ?

Tangential velocity squared is proportional to centipital force

Fc =mVt2/r

Tan. Genital. ? Hahaha

Sorry I guess I read that wrong

Moreover, the theory of Flat Earth contradicts the law of universal gravitation, which has been verified for a very long time. It states that gravitation is a force in 1 / r², so it is spherically symmetrical (all points on the same sphere of radius r undergo the same force). This explains why all celestial bodies have a spherical shape if their mass is sufficient (so excluding asteroids, etc.). The flat Earth theory directly contradicts Newton's law of gravitation and the Einsteinian theory of general relativity as well.

Kami... You need a big red pill to swallow

Again.

You need to provide a ***CAUSE*** for gravity!!

You cannot assert it.

You are wrong on so many areas you need a causation for gravity