Oddly enough the force can be enough fpr it tp move

a torus field ?

The more dense something is, the more gravitational force it exerts on other objects

@Zerato

These^^^^^^^^^

WHAT!!!? Another one,on the way? My dude!! Congratulations !!!

What is that?

Holy moly

@PicklePot kinda sorta true

the earth magnetic field is good explained by the globe model

^

Interesting how globe earthers don't know about the dielectric torus field around the earth. It's on both models.

The globe model fails in every way....its like swiss cheese

yes, everything is neatly packaged & presented into the globe model

well, almost everything

Youre like swiss cheese

@Zerato Except that a torus field doesn't create a sphere. It creates a flat plane

We don't know about it because it's false. Now if you'll excuse me I have a life to get back to

Lol at 21 tomcat

I personally@love swiss cheese on everything

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 According to the law of Gauss, the magnetic field measured is good explained by the spherical model

is it the torus fields that help produce tides and winds? @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

@PicklePot It's literally on your model, **GENIUS!!**

Rude

Haha. Yup

@Zerato No, it's actually not.

Yes it is. kami Sama is completely right.

Kick their ass Mad Phil.

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 It is actually good explained

You can't ecplain why a torus field only creates a sphere on the globe model and never anytime else in history or by testable replication. @Zerato

No, it's not.

Nit at all

Not in the slightest

Not ever

Correct phil

i just heard they cant solve a 3 body problem in space

That as well ^^^^

If gravity affects all mass the earth couldnt be flat. It would bend in on its self

hyman sheeple join back

Gravity is a theory and mass does not attract mass