They also claimed had only 3 of the bulkheads broken, Titanic would have still remained afloat

The argument is 4 bulkheads were flooded and the ship lost buoyancy

That is how buoyancy works

Dk is back

Which one

Well buoyancy would have kept titanic alive if the main actress had bigger boobs

Iceberg.. Right.

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 You think bomb too?

The titanic being an inside job that's not a theory I've heard before

Well if we can first prove BOMB
```NOT```
Iceberg

Then that opens other possibilities

Good luck

Not sure what it was, but it clearly came from the inside.

Or and this will sound insane

It's a very old wreck slowly collapsing under it's own weight

That magically takes puncture areas and invert them so perfectly?

also if that was the hole I think that would be above the waterline

also it's on a line where two plates are riveted together

Aka a weak point

Man, you just want to deny anything that wasn't taught to you in school or your parents..

Tf

What I said actully makes sense

No, it didn't.

It would be above the waterline

That would not sink it

I have never seen an exploiting on a boat look like that

overheated boiler?

Alonso is there an actual image and not an artists depiction

Show me examples of ships or other materials being damaged from one side and inverting over time so perfectly that it looks like it was damaged from the exact opposite side.

The explosions normally go up

@solarstan yt Show me how that was above the water line and not at all a threat.

That is normally the weakest part

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 it's on the same welding line as the anchors

If you count the weldings between plates from the deck you will see they are equal

No, it's not.

It is tho

The biggest hole is much lower.

It is one billow, being less likely to be an explosion

It isn't, though..

If a Bomb were on the ship. That is the place you would want to put it, since that area is the weaker part. Like this one that simply collapsed as it was moored at the dock.