Which is as simple as looking

And counting lines

You typed assertions, pulled from your ass. You, then, cited wiki with nothing to verify that wiki is correct.

**ERGO!! YOU HAVE PROVED NOTHING!!**

I just cant be bothered to explain to you how simple this is

I have shown

But you refuse to see

You don't seem to understand what proof is.

I do

Or the concept of **VERIFICATION**

You are claiming that it isnt above the waterline

It can be visually proved its above the waterline

No, I'm demanding evidence that it is above the water line and not at all a threat.

Which you cannot do.

YOU CAN LOOK AT IT

You're not correctly following the lines of perspective.

Your not looking at physical lines

The tear is 2 welding lines down from the deck

The anchor is 3 welding lines down

In between them another welding line is added by a higher deck

They are on equal level

The anchors were high on the ships bow

The tear is above the waterline

Wow he is not good at debating is he

!mute @solarstan yt gossiping

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> **solarstan yt#1407** was muted
```
reason: gossiping
```

!mute <@!582348351790645265> gossiping

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> **STFU Z#8258** was muted
```
reason: gossiping
```

Oof I’m chat

*in

Good evening

Oh shid, just realized it was 4:30 pm

Missed my favourite part of the day

@Mr.science hey 👋

Hey Gwench

He didn't corner me. He tried using anecdotal evidence as proof of reality.

You clearly don't understand how debates work. Or how to present anything of worth.

Uhhh?

What now

Responding to an idiot

Hope I ain’t the idiot <:kitty1:507996065115406352>