Message from @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

Discord ID: 582347054702133259


2019-05-26 23:14:28 UTC  

You provided no proof

2019-05-26 23:14:34 UTC  

I did

2019-05-26 23:14:52 UTC  

**not**

2019-05-26 23:15:01 UTC  

Did not*

2019-05-26 23:15:31 UTC  

Where was your link?

2019-05-26 23:15:39 UTC  

Seems to be missing.

2019-05-26 23:15:49 UTC  

Looks like you're being dishonest.

2019-05-26 23:16:21 UTC  

You did, in fact, only type words and expected that to be enough evidence. Because I see no links.

2019-05-26 23:16:56 UTC  

The bow hit the bottom at a speed of about 20 knots (23 mph; 37 km/h), digging about 60 feet (18 m) deep into the mud, up to the base of the anchors. The impact bent the hull in two places and caused it to buckle downwards by about 10° under the forward well deck cranes and by about 4° under the forward expansion joint. When the bow section hit the sea bed, the weakened decks at the rear, where the ship had broken apart, collapsed on top of each other.[68] The forward hatch cover was also blown off and landed a couple of hundred feet in front of the bow, possibly due to the force of water being pushed out as the bow impacted the bottom.[70]

2019-05-26 23:17:22 UTC  

Also a link is not the only evidence

2019-05-26 23:17:39 UTC  

I was using a physical measurement that can be measured with your eyes

2019-05-26 23:17:48 UTC  

Looks like you copy/pasted wiki

2019-05-26 23:17:55 UTC  

And its right

2019-05-26 23:18:01 UTC  

Prove it

2019-05-26 23:18:15 UTC  

You have yet to do so

2019-05-26 23:18:25 UTC  

I have proved things

2019-05-26 23:18:32 UTC  

You have proved nothing

2019-05-26 23:18:45 UTC  

Because you didnt test the proof

2019-05-26 23:18:51 UTC  

Which is as simple as looking

2019-05-26 23:18:58 UTC  

And counting lines

2019-05-26 23:19:17 UTC  

You typed assertions, pulled from your ass. You, then, cited wiki with nothing to verify that wiki is correct.

2019-05-26 23:19:31 UTC  

**ERGO!! YOU HAVE PROVED NOTHING!!**

2019-05-26 23:19:58 UTC  

I just cant be bothered to explain to you how simple this is

2019-05-26 23:20:04 UTC  

I have shown

2019-05-26 23:20:08 UTC  

But you refuse to see

2019-05-26 23:20:24 UTC  

You don't seem to understand what proof is.

2019-05-26 23:20:33 UTC  

I do

2019-05-26 23:20:45 UTC  

Or the concept of **VERIFICATION**

2019-05-26 23:20:47 UTC  

You are claiming that it isnt above the waterline

2019-05-26 23:21:02 UTC  

It can be visually proved its above the waterline

2019-05-26 23:21:14 UTC  

No, I'm demanding evidence that it is above the water line and not at all a threat.

2019-05-26 23:21:18 UTC  

Which you cannot do.

2019-05-26 23:21:26 UTC  

YOU CAN LOOK AT IT

2019-05-26 23:21:49 UTC  

You're not correctly following the lines of perspective.

2019-05-26 23:24:19 UTC  

Your not looking at physical lines

2019-05-26 23:25:20 UTC  

The tear is 2 welding lines down from the deck

2019-05-26 23:25:35 UTC  

The anchor is 3 welding lines down

2019-05-26 23:25:53 UTC  

In between them another welding line is added by a higher deck

2019-05-26 23:26:15 UTC  

They are on equal level

2019-05-26 23:26:40 UTC  

The anchors were high on the ships bow

2019-05-26 23:26:55 UTC  

The tear is above the waterline