Message from @Cosmonaut!
Discord ID: 593253837742145536
Or regular definition
The first is the google definition.
Observation, hypothesis, measurement, and experiment.
The second.
so jack, do you just regurgitate the words of others, or do you speak the language of English? just curious
@Abe Lover both are equally good. Nasa just had to dumb it down a little so people would understand
No they changed the definition entirely
First definition DELETES force
Second one adds a force
not really. The non-nasa definition goes more in-depth
The second, is simply observation, measurement, and experiment.
The earth is clearly flat if it was round how did nasa take this picture
No it literally says NO FORCE
You don’t actually need to hypothesize shit.
See no force
you cannot prove the concept of orbits through experimentation. your bickering over semantics is a pointless deflection. @Mystery NASA had absolutely no real pictures of earth. what you think are “pictures” are CGI images
The blue marble is a very artificial image in any case
Oh, the meme army is here too?? Yeah, composite is a real thing
@AltHarrington so again
You can if you want after, but at any rate, what’s important is that you’re able to make an observation, measure the observation, and experiment with it.
Which one
composites can be easily faked. you could use them to make a flat or globe model. it proves nothing
There’s one full image of the earth and I believe it was taken on the moon 😑
*earth
What?
Ohhh
sorry my brain died
Anyone can take pictures of the moon
I can right now
have a camera 6 inches away from a basketball, but you want a picture of the whole thing... what do you do
move further away kek
Stop trying to promote your spinning water pear belief inside an infinite vacuum
keep regurgitating your shill talking points