That's not how burden of proof works

if i said i can fly...is it on you to prove i cant?@Cosmonaut!

*Several people are typing*

Yep, and I'm POSITIVE you guys fact check the meme spam you send out... right

if i said i can fly...is it on you to prove i cant?@Cosmonaut!

stop spamming

asnwer then

If we are to believe Sheeple that satellites hang at just 40Km altitude, we can calculate the HORIZONTAL distance from me to the satellite :
tan(24.38) = 40Km/H_distance ---> H_distance = 88Km
Just 88Km (to south) away from me !?
If that ^ would be true, satellite antennas in Malmo (another city which is just 180Km down to the south from me)
would have to point toward NORTH, not south !!!!!!!!
But in REALITY, ALL satellite antennas from the nordic hemisphere are oriented toward SOUTH *
<<<<<<< C A S E C L O S E D ! >>>>>>>

cosmonaut check dms

!mute @Tiktok Told you to stop spamming.

@Tiktok Cite your sources

@Tiktok can you back that claim?

ice box time

not anymore lol

Its a false equivalence - I think it’s a little unfair for me to have to have “been there” to verify, yet derek posted about the temperature of the thermosphere without having to “be there

Different burdens of proof, plus I could basically just use that argument over and over for anything that you post. Its a bit disingenuous.

well then i dont need to show you that i can fly to prove i can fly

The temperature of the thermosphere is what we are told. Yet nowhere in real life can we verify that’s the case with other elements enduring that temperature in a vacuum.

But posting about the temp of the thermosphere without also posting about how objects radiate heat AWAY is disingenuous.

It shows lack of understanding

Radiating heat away is a Claim.

Prove it.

Show me how that is done in a vacuum.

science does not deal in proofs

Real science does. Pseudoscience doesn’t.

science never deals in proofs. Look up "scientific proof" and the first google hit will be "scientific evidence"

No such thing as scientific proof

Of course. Yes, Google is the answer to everything. Nevermind they bury information like nazi’s burned books.

@Derek Nelson use ecosia

Ask anyone in science if they EVER deal with PROOF or if SCIENTIFIC PROOF is a thing.... they will all say no

That's actually true. Since science is based in philosophy, there is no settlement of information about anything.

Everything is up for debate and nothing is ever settled.

If that’s the case then what category would we place proof in?

None

mythical

Court.

Court is still subjective and often flawed

no such thing as 100% proof

Philosophically, I can't agree to the term, proof.

Well, in that case, philosophy can kiss my ass.

I require proof.