not anymore lol

Its a false equivalence - I think it’s a little unfair for me to have to have “been there” to verify, yet derek posted about the temperature of the thermosphere without having to “be there

Different burdens of proof, plus I could basically just use that argument over and over for anything that you post. Its a bit disingenuous.

well then i dont need to show you that i can fly to prove i can fly

The temperature of the thermosphere is what we are told. Yet nowhere in real life can we verify that’s the case with other elements enduring that temperature in a vacuum.

But posting about the temp of the thermosphere without also posting about how objects radiate heat AWAY is disingenuous.

It shows lack of understanding

Radiating heat away is a Claim.

Prove it.

Show me how that is done in a vacuum.

science does not deal in proofs

Real science does. Pseudoscience doesn’t.

science never deals in proofs. Look up "scientific proof" and the first google hit will be "scientific evidence"

No such thing as scientific proof

Of course. Yes, Google is the answer to everything. Nevermind they bury information like nazi’s burned books.

@Derek Nelson use ecosia

Ask anyone in science if they EVER deal with PROOF or if SCIENTIFIC PROOF is a thing.... they will all say no

That's actually true. Since science is based in philosophy, there is no settlement of information about anything.

Everything is up for debate and nothing is ever settled.

If that’s the case then what category would we place proof in?

None

mythical

Court.

Court is still subjective and often flawed

no such thing as 100% proof

Philosophically, I can't agree to the term, proof.

Well, in that case, philosophy can kiss my ass.

I require proof.

You'll be waiting a while.

If you want to learn how science deals with evidence, theories and laws, - https://youtu.be/lqk3TKuGNBA
But I know you wont watch it

You might as well have typed "I DEMAND PURPLE UNICORN LEPRECHAUNS" -

science does not deal in proof

So you mean to tell me, mainstream science gets to tell us how everything works, without ever having to prove a single thing.

Watch the video, it explains everything

There’s another word for that.

It’s called religion.

Can you 100% prove... ANYTHING?

By the scientific method, yes.

Is there something wrong with observation, measurement, and experiment?

Even by science, they dont deal in proofs... (told you that you wouldnt watch the video)

the vid does explain it well

At this point, we arent even speaking the same language... proof does not exist

replace it in your vocabulary with "evidence" - and you will be part way there

Part way to a point where proof doesn’t matter. Sounds like a dead end.