Steve, we are talking in 2 dimensions here, how is this so hard to understand?

"Science" ⚛ — see the hexagram within it? ( 🔯 )

The Fed has total control. So no the Fed would make sure you were paid nothing and they might even pay so you would lose your reputation and even your life if necessary.

I’m not trying to be mean, but I am oversimplifying something that is already so simple to understand. And now we are talking about some secret government agency. I mean, come on man

@Enn a lot of scientists were weirdly like that

*uh-huh*, and many had an agenda to dismantle religion

––Specifically, Christianity

Scientific Debates on here always degrade to some secret Illuminati discussion about aliens or some other s***

Because you claimed that someone could question religion sold as science and get paid for it. You showed you have no clue of what money really is.

does seem that way enn

We were talking about the speed of light, now money? You are attacking a straw man figure

The Fed rules the earth. We are not allowed to question what they sell as truth.

Alright cya man

You say light can meet light at double the speed of light. Yet it is not double the speed of light. Really. How is that logical thinking?

No. If two cars are driving toward each other at 10 MPH at a distance of 20 MPH apart, how long and where will they meet?

If I know someone 100 miles away and can travel at 50 mph on a highway we can meet in an hour. Yet the total distance traveled was 100 miles. Do you disagree with that?

Will their speeds double? No

Thing is about science is it's a contemporary philosophy that advertises itself as being matter-of-factly '100% sure'—"there you have it, the science is settled"—as if man's word is infallible; and we all know what the thinker thinks, the prover proves, and that's how these theories are always ever-changing. They find out one thing and then counter it with another, and it's usually based on corporate interests, such as if vaccinations are safe or is coffee and eggs good for you daily, etc.

Yes, so why can’t u understand that in terms of light speed

Yet you say that if I am a photon and my friend is a photon 2 ly away we can not meet in a year?

The "evidence" is used to back agendas.

YES we can meet in a year

But their speeds never change

—climate change is a big one

Then in a year we transverse 2 ly.

@Steve Angell it's basically that very logic that einstein is claiming is not true

We approach each other at double the speed of light.

TOGETHER we do, but individually we have only traveled 1 lay

Ly*

and people disagree with einstein

Circular reason. But Einstein said. He is a liar why would I care what he said.

but i think he's literally telling us, "that's not a hole, your logic is wrong." that's what einstein's claiming to us

*sigh*

I don’t want to insult intelligences here, but did you take an algebra class?

I am saying Einstein was a liar. He provided lies not truth.

I took advanced Calculus.

yep i don't think anyone has to believe einstein

Someone remove new member please

I took Physics requiring that.

Then how tf is this so hard to understand

Three semesters in all.