Message from @Enn

Discord ID: 597167633091002370


2019-07-06 20:47:44 UTC  

A^2 + B^2 = C^2, It actually comes out to 66.61 feet.

2019-07-06 20:47:47 UTC  

And even if you do explain it, you're explaining it from your point-of-view, which is subjective, especially if you're describing the contrast of wood in comparison to your skin upon knocking.

2019-07-06 20:48:10 UTC  

You have to multiply the miles into feet of course.

2019-07-06 20:48:11 UTC  

words kind of just connect ideas that already existed in someone's experience in a way

2019-07-06 20:48:19 UTC  

yess

2019-07-06 20:48:19 UTC  

Once again, stop using your eyes for everything. I’m sorry, but the human senses are still just that, *human*. If science was based on just using our sense for everything we would still think that we lived on a flat plane (which some obviously still do believe)

2019-07-06 20:48:26 UTC  

😥

2019-07-06 20:48:41 UTC  

That’s why we have science

2019-07-06 20:48:50 UTC  

And take the square root of C. Subtract the radius from C.

2019-07-06 20:49:07 UTC  

It’s not the Pythagorean theorem by the way

2019-07-06 20:49:08 UTC  

interesting part is we still don't have instruments to measure everything, such as x-ray and radar

2019-07-06 20:49:10 UTC  

A is the radius. B is the distance.

2019-07-06 20:49:36 UTC  

It is a trigonometric function you should use to calculate curvature, I’ll get it for you in a sec

2019-07-06 20:49:36 UTC  

@Steve Angell that sounds legit

2019-07-06 20:49:51 UTC  

steve's math is gud imo

2019-07-06 20:49:56 UTC  

There are instruments to measure radar power and x-ray power.

2019-07-06 20:50:20 UTC  

ik but i mean beyond those

2019-07-06 20:50:23 UTC  

h = r * (1 - cos a)

2019-07-06 20:50:35 UTC  

Use that next time you measure curvature

2019-07-06 20:50:46 UTC  

even according to globe science, 95% of the universe is unobservable i guess

2019-07-06 20:50:58 UTC  

that's what i mean

2019-07-06 20:51:02 UTC  

@thing that's exactly what he did, but he used the pythagorean theorem instead

2019-07-06 20:51:05 UTC  

Because the theorem you suggest is a right angle, which doesn’t measure curvature , it can however measure linear distances

2019-07-06 20:51:06 UTC  

I did not trust anything so I just used the math I remembered as I knew that worked in construction I did at home.

2019-07-06 20:51:24 UTC  

the formula you posted and the one steve used are equivalent]

2019-07-06 20:51:33 UTC  

Guys sheeple has a 2 TB files on this YOU AINT GUNNA WIN THIS ARGUMENT

2019-07-06 20:51:44 UTC  

but what if the universe is the neural network of God

2019-07-06 20:51:48 UTC  

It is a right angle we look out at. The curvature is C in that equation. A and B are at right angles.

2019-07-06 20:51:54 UTC  

You should also take into factor the elevation in which you are measuring,

2019-07-06 20:52:05 UTC  

ether as a fluid

2019-07-06 20:52:06 UTC  

The earth isn’t a uniformly smooth sphere

2019-07-06 20:52:14 UTC  
2019-07-06 20:52:26 UTC  

Elevation makes no difference looking across a lake. Same on both sides of it.

2019-07-06 20:52:30 UTC  

what if Earth is God's pineal gland

2019-07-06 20:52:36 UTC  

Lol

2019-07-06 20:52:40 UTC  

@thing well your equation doesn't take that into account either

2019-07-06 20:52:49 UTC  

you guys gave the same equation

2019-07-06 20:52:56 UTC  

I know, that’s why there is more to be done then just simple math

2019-07-06 20:53:17 UTC  

I guess it does not but it would be a tiny percentage of an inch difference.

2019-07-06 20:53:22 UTC  

Take the atmosphere into account as well

2019-07-06 20:53:26 UTC  

Air pollution