Appeal to definition fallacy

You could literally do that with ANY set of words... LOL

Yikes

oh great a masonic look at the bble lool

That's a made up fallacy

Just supposed "experts" demanding I believe them not my own eyes.

Cherry picking at its finest

It’s in the dictionary as an official term sheeple

```Description: Using a dictionary’s limited definition of a term as evidence that term cannot have another meaning, expanded meaning, or even conflicting meaning. This is a fallacy because dictionaries don’t reason; they simply are a reflection of an abbreviated version of the current accepted usage of a term, as determined by argumentation and eventual acceptance. In short, dictionaries tell you what a word meant, according to the authors, at the time of its writing, not what it meant before that time, after, or what it should mean.

```

It’s still picking some sort of information and interpreting in a logical way

So the dictionary is wrong

Alright then

Words don't mean anything then

Wow

Deep

OK let's look up the SCIENTIFIC definition

"The important point that Becher introduced is that the explanation of a natural phenomenon (i.e., MODEL, theory) must be "TESTABLE" by "EXPERIMENTATION" .
In other words once a MODEL is proposed as an explanation of a phenomenon, it can "ONLY" be considered a "SCIENTIFIC MODEL" if it can be objectively
"TESTED BY EXPERIMENTATION ."
http://www.iun.edu/~cpanhd/C101webnotes/introduction/scientific-method.html

Religion. An institutional system of beliefs taught. Often called science.

I think your premise was incorrect to begin with - first word chosen sent you down a rabbit hole until it confirmed your bias

Hence my calling out the fallacy

Messy

Is a model airplane the same as a scientific model?

This is all opinions.

DisProve timezones flat earthers

Or is it the mod·el
/ˈmädl/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
a three-dimensional representation of a person or thing or of a proposed structure, typically on a smaller scale than the original.

^

Number 2 on the deffination. Science is often religion. So many beliefs taught with no solid proof. That is religion not actual Science.

@mineyful So where's the TESTABLE EXPERIMENT for the globe?

a system or thing used as an example to follow or imitate.

Evolution is religion

That’s the second bit

If it's not testable, then it's not a SCIENTIFIC model then, is it?

I’m not arguing the globe rn just calling out the fallacy

Helping to strengthen your argument

It's not a fallacy if you can't prove the globe is a scientific model

If it's not a scientific model, then it's a system of postulates

The Earth is round, explain timezones

postulates are beliefs

Like the article someone posted on the Ball Earth. It just really said. We are the Experts so believe us. In other words we are demanding you believe our religious teachings including do not call it religion.

a system of beliefs is a religion

@Human Sheeple explain timezones